All the openings that I know.

Sort:
nate36604

LordVandheer

Wow. Do you want a candy?

actual_knight_gaming
Ethan_Brollier

But... but what do I do against 4. Qe2!! threatening 4... d5 5. exd5 where exd5 is no longer possible due to the absolute pin, @actual_knight_gaming?

actual_knight_gaming
Ethan_Brollier wrote:

But... but what do I do against 4. Qe2!! threatening 4... d5 5. exd5 where exd5 is no longer possible due to the absolute pin, @actual_knight_gaming?

Qe2 is easier to defend against, possibly because

  • the absolute pin on the pawn can be broken by blocking with either the dark-squared bishop or queen

also because the early queen development isn't really recommended

i could also be completely wrong about this. im sorry lol dont hurt me

Ethan_Brollier
actual_knight_gaming wrote:
Ethan_Brollier wrote:

But... but what do I do against 4. Qe2!! threatening 4... d5 5. exd5 where exd5 is no longer possible due to the absolute pin, @actual_knight_gaming?

Qe2 is easier to defend against, possibly because

  • the absolute pin on the pawn can be broken by blocking with either the dark-squared bishop or queen

also because the early queen development isn't really recommended

lol fair but then 0-0 and Re1 and you have yourself a game. I'm not a Bowdler defender but... loathe as I am to admit it, it is actually quite playable for both sides.

LordVandheer
actual_knight_gaming wrote:
Ethan_Brollier wrote:

But... but what do I do against 4. Qe2!! threatening 4... d5 5. exd5 where exd5 is no longer possible due to the absolute pin, @actual_knight_gaming?

Qe2 is easier to defend against, possibly because

  • the absolute pin on the pawn can be broken by blocking with either the dark-squared bishop or queen

also because the early queen development isn't really recommended

i could also be completely wrong about this. im sorry lol dont hurt me

The top line isn't recommended? Damn man, the cloud analysis and leading theoreticans tricked us all.

actual_knight_gaming
Ethan_Brollier wrote:
actual_knight_gaming wrote:
Ethan_Brollier wrote:

But... but what do I do against 4. Qe2!! threatening 4... d5 5. exd5 where exd5 is no longer possible due to the absolute pin, @actual_knight_gaming?

Qe2 is easier to defend against, possibly because

  • the absolute pin on the pawn can be broken by blocking with either the dark-squared bishop or queen

also because the early queen development isn't really recommended

lol fair but then 0-0 and Re1 and you have yourself a game. I'm not a Bowdler defender but... loathe as I am to admit it, it is actually quite playable for both sides.

I myself like the opening for the strong c- and d- pawns.

Defending against the Bowdler is a bit troublesome at times, though lol

Ethan_Brollier
actual_knight_gaming wrote:
Ethan_Brollier wrote:
actual_knight_gaming wrote:
Ethan_Brollier wrote:

But... but what do I do against 4. Qe2!! threatening 4... d5 5. exd5 where exd5 is no longer possible due to the absolute pin, @actual_knight_gaming?

Qe2 is easier to defend against, possibly because

  • the absolute pin on the pawn can be broken by blocking with either the dark-squared bishop or queen

also because the early queen development isn't really recommended

lol fair but then 0-0 and Re1 and you have yourself a game. I'm not a Bowdler defender but... loathe as I am to admit it, it is actually quite playable for both sides.

I myself like the opening for the strong c- and d- pawns.

Defending against the Bowdler is a bit troublesome at times, though lol

Same. I came to play an Open, Closed, or Anti-Sicilian, not the hecking Bowdler, y'know what I mean? Thankfully nobody knows how to play it, so nobody plays Qe2 e5 stopping the d5 push with the threat of en passant, and the early d5 push is premature and allows White counterplay. If people did that and knew how to play, the Bowdler would be a lot scarier than the simple annoyance it currently is.

actual_knight_gaming
Ethan_Brollier wrote:
actual_knight_gaming wrote:
Ethan_Brollier wrote:
actual_knight_gaming wrote:
Ethan_Brollier wrote:

But... but what do I do against 4. Qe2!! threatening 4... d5 5. exd5 where exd5 is no longer possible due to the absolute pin, @actual_knight_gaming?

Qe2 is easier to defend against, possibly because

  • the absolute pin on the pawn can be broken by blocking with either the dark-squared bishop or queen

also because the early queen development isn't really recommended

lol fair but then 0-0 and Re1 and you have yourself a game. I'm not a Bowdler defender but... loathe as I am to admit it, it is actually quite playable for both sides.

I myself like the opening for the strong c- and d- pawns.

Defending against the Bowdler is a bit troublesome at times, though lol

Same. I came to play an Open, Closed, or Anti-Sicilian, not the hecking Bowdler, y'know what I mean? Thankfully nobody knows how to play it, so nobody plays Qe2 e5 stopping the d5 push with the threat of en passant, and the early d5 push is premature and allows White counterplay. If people did that and knew how to play, the Bowdler would be a lot scarier than the simple annoyance it currently is.

"I feel like playing a Sicilian today"

"ooo scary Bc4 (5?)"

I agree. The Bowdler is a monster when used in the right hands.

At my level, it's just people trying to play Scholar's Mate, lol

SamuelAjedrez95
actual_knight_gaming wrote:

I agree. The Bowdler is a monster when used in the right hands.

Omg 🤣🤣🤣 that's really funny. If you think the Bowdler Attack is a monster, you really need to get better at playing the Sicilian.

SamuelAjedrez95
LordVandheer wrote:

Wow. Do you want a candy?

Just a "well done" sticker

actual_knight_gaming
SamuelAjedrez95 wrote:
actual_knight_gaming wrote:

I agree. The Bowdler is a monster when used in the right hands.

Omg 🤣🤣🤣 that's really funny. If you think the Bowdler Attack is a monster, you really need to get better at playing the Sicilian.

I mean, maybe like the Mike Wazowski kinda monster, y'know?

nate36604
SamuelAjedrez95 wrote:
LordVandheer wrote:

Wow. Do you want a candy?

Just a "well done" sticker

: :
: :
: :

:
:
::
:
::
:
:

Hailey

please, teach me how you know all those.

I just know one : (

SamuelAjedrez95
actual_knight_gaming wrote:

I mean, maybe like the Mike Wazowski kinda monster, y'know?

Yeah, maybe that kinda monster.

nate36604
HaileyRocksAtChess wrote:

please, teach me how you know all those.

I just know one : (

Ok go to dms

DeDrieBs

So what do you mean by "knowing" the opening? Do you know all of the opening aims (incl. of the subvariations of course), middlegame strategies and move order subtleties or do you just play some moves without knowing why?
For amateurs who have regular fulltime jobs, it's already hard work to REALLY know a single opening.

nate36604
DeDrieBs wrote:

So what do you mean by "knowing" the opening? Do you know all of the opening aims (incl. of the subvariations of course), middlegame strategies and move order subtleties or do you just play some moves without knowing why?
For amateurs who have regular fulltime jobs, it's already hard work to REALLY know a single opening.

bro im just trying to have fun sad.png your harshing my vibe

magipi

The sad part is that even 2 years later, the OP is still rated 200.

This shows how important openings are. (Hint: not at all).