Andrew's Opening

Andrew's Opening is an amazing opening. To prove this, my friend @itisSHOWTIME beat his friend 3 times with this system. Here is the move order for white:

1. h4 2. Nh3 3. g3 4. Bg2 5. 0-0 6. Kh2

Some kid named Andrew that invented this opening does not have Chess.com, so I give credit to @itisSHOWTIME for popularizing the opening. 

The refutation:

You plays 2. g3 and 3. Nh3. You can take out any element. Just don't move your king to h2.

bro that's not how white responds to g5. There are other ways to respond.

I have pulverized the lichess field with this opening.

That opening is objectively bad.

Where is the checkmate?

6-1 with it. (well on lichess, so either it's a good opening or the lichess field doesn't know a refutation. I know I don't know one.)

The refutation is basically developing normally. Opponents at our level are bad lol. They can’t refute anything.

Here is a double Andrew's opening. My opponent was 1900 on lichess, which is the equivalent of 1700 on chess.com.

https://lichess.org/C2L32IYTlYVF

This doesn't look great for white ngl

Of course, 1200s can play g4 + h4 and still win so what does it matter

No, it’s the equivalent of 1500 on chess.com. Also, your opponent blundered left and right. You didn’t win because of the opening.

Maybe it's physicological. And I'm pretty sure it's 1600, actually. Chess.com you start at 1200, whereas lichess you start at 1500.

why don't all you guys who say it's bad actually try it.

and lose all my rating? no thanks

If you aren't going to play it, then how do you know it's bad.

1. Engine

2. Doesn't take any central space

evaluation