The Kronberger Variation (2.Na3) and the Myers Attack (2.a4) openings are in the Game Explorer here at chess.com. But as you can readily see by inspection, the number of games given with each of those is far too small to provide a strong perspective on the merits of either (especially the Myers).
However, you will take most opponents by surprise. Indeed, there are two quotes that come to mind: a) "Any opening that doesn't lose outright is playable," and b) "Dubious, therefore playable."
BTW, I avoid the Sicilian from both sides.
Can anyone give me some suggestions for off-beat (unorthodox) variations to play against the Sicilian? I'm looking for something which is reasonably sound, but hasn't been analysed to death up to umpteen moves.
I am currently looking at the following ideas:
I've been playing the Sicilian Wing Gambit (1.e4 c5 2.b4) with good results, but would like to experiment with something different.