Hi, I have played the Panov for some time and am still unsure whether it is the best line. though you will certainly get IQP games. There is a book by Jacob Agaard, which I do not recommend. There is also a book by the Russian GM Alexander Baburin, who now lives in Dublin. He wrote a good book, which is now out of print, that covers the Panov. But it is difficult and requires a lot of study. Soviet school of chess stuff. My tipss:
1. Book up on the four knights line where black brings out his bishop to g5. You have got to know it well.
2. If you create a battery (with your queen on d3 and bishop on c2) remember to play a3 first. Figure out a way to continue the attack after black plays g6.
Ok? cheers.
Hi,
I'm planning to dive in to the Panov-Attack against the caro-kann and therefore have some questions:
- do you have any book recommondations which cover the panov-attack from the white perspective?
- do you think it is a proper choice against the caro-kann?
as a e4 player i have sort of made all the other choices what to play against various defences, but have never really understood the caro-kann and went for a kingside pawn-storm in the advance variation gaining tempos on that bishop (not knowing any theory about it and only having limited success ;S)
a reason i want to play the panov is because i find iqp positions quite interesting and it seems pretty likely to me that one might occur, aggressive play suites me as well (i at least believe so), which is why i believe the panov is a reasonable choice for me.
Thank you in advance