Tch, c4 is the best. That way your opponent will have to resign on the count that he is deceaced. c4 for the explosive win!!!!
d4 or e4
Here is a very recent game I played with a strong attack using d4 on live.
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game.html?id=10857422
I got to 1800+ OTB with 1. d4 and 1. c4 (although the opening itself was of little consequence) but I'm learning 1. e4 now. I feel it will help my chess to get more experience in the Open Games or incredibly complex lines of the Dragon and Ruy Lopez. I don't know if I prefer one over the other since they're so different. However, I feel it's easier to play 1. d4 but also easier to equalize against it.
DEAR APOKALPS
i wish you, your family and loved ones the happiest and safest of holidays
MY WIFE AND I ARE GOING TO HAWAII FOR THE FIRST TIME FOR TWO WEEKS IN APRIL 2009, ANY GOOD INFO YOU HAVE ON GOOD BUT MONEY SAVINGS WAYS TO EAT THERE AND PLACES AS WE DON'T HAVE ALL INCLUSIVE
LODGING, PLEASE SEND ANY INFO TO MY EMAIL AT antne003@verizon.net
I AM JUST A BEGINNER TO MEDIUM PLAYER AND I APPRECIATE OPINIONS FROM OTHER MEMBERS OF THIS FORUM.
I'M A RETIRED POLICE CHIEF FROM NEAR ATLANTIC CITY NEW JERSEY AND I'M 61(YOU PROBALY WEREN'T EVEN BORN WHEN I WAS AND SOUND WAY YOUNGER. IT WOULD BE GREAT TO MEET YOU IN PERSON AND PLAY SOME CHESS(IF YOU DON'T MINE THAT I MAY NOT BE UP TO YOUR CALIBER OF PLAY.
IF INTERESTED, GIVE ME ALL INFO SO I MAY BE ABLE TO CONTACT YOU WHEN WE ARRIVE THERE,(I AM ALSO DISABLED FROM A STROKE I SUFFERED IN 2002
MY LEG IS COMING BACK GREAT AND I WALK WITHOUT A CANE(BUT STILL TAKE IT ALONG AS A SAFEGUARD), MY LEFT HAND STILL DOES NOT OPEN SINCE MY STROKE, I WOULD LOVE TO MEET YOU AND YOUR FAMILY
EMAIL ME antne003@verizon.net, my user name is antne003 and i play chess on chess.com by that name
DEAR DMYTRO, I ALSO LIKE PLAYING THE SCOTCH, BUT I'M NOT AS ADVANCED AS YOU ARE, I HAVE A GOOD PLAYER HELPING ME EVERY MONDAY AND TUESDAY NIGHTS GIVING ME IDEAS OF THE BEST MOVES IN VARIOUS VARIATION OF LINES, I WANT TO KNOW AS MUCH AS I CAN ABOUT THE SCOTCH AND PURPOSE OF EACH MOVE IN THE VARIOUS LINES
ANY HELP YOU CAN GIVE ME, I WOULD APPRECIATE IT , MY EMAIL IS
take care and happy holidays
ANTHONY SOLIS
314 SOUTH RAILROAD AVENUE
RIO GRANDE, NEW JERSEY 08242
If you are beginner, you should shelf d4 until you know how to play. e4 is definitely the better choice under any circumstances because, if he answers e5, it will be even(and maybe white has a minuscule advantage), and then whoever is better will usually win. But it's usually a struggle.
I was not able to use 1.d4 until I had done an extensive amount of study, and not without losing many games. It is not for beginners at all. It requires a positional and tactical understanding that is not required of e4, usually. I know this because, if I want to win a game very fast against beginners, I use 1. d4, and then try for something like the Catalan or the King's Indian Attack, which are highly transpositional and can head in any Mountain Ranges you want.
(I like transpositional openings)
well e4 is more complicated and contains more tactics,against a stronger player than me ,i loose with e4 but i have chances with d4
i use e4 for white, as i like to play the scotch. as black defenses, i use c3 (caro kann) against e4 and d5 against d4 (slav defense)
sorry but i'm just a beginner and i needed a openingh for white and defenses for black
hope i was correct on the start of the slav defense?
thanks tony from jersey shore(antne003)
ps what are the best variation lines for caro-kann(i like panov attack) and for slav?)
1.d4
If it's good enough for Anand, it's good enough for me.
Anand is predominately an 1e4 player and I know you know.....
Well there's that. But when it came time for the most important match of his career, he turned to ....... 1.d4! I think he even gave it an exclam when he annotated the match.
The list of 1.d4 players also includes Kasparov, Karpov, Petrosian, Botvinnik, Lasker, Capablanca, Alekhine.
i like e4, especially against weaker players. I love the book My System and a lot of the openings he talks about start with e4.
Why is that.
Because to play the d4 effectivly means controlling the center gradually, True you can play the QG to open up the game a little, however the development of the pieces on the King side take a little longer, so black can develop a king side attack taking advantage of whites undeveloped King side. I have been exploring a line of the d4 called veresov-richter attack. I have made a small improvement to it, where I wound up with a knight and bishop for a bishop in the first seven moves, though that was not the intent.
Anyway this was the position. I got to. Of the 13 games I have played that got to this position only one played the correct continuation of Bf5. Everyone else played h6, or Be7. Both are natural moves, meant to prevent the pin on the knight. But what follows is Bxf6 (Bxf6 or Qxf6 or gxf6 for blacks responce) and then Nxg4 capping blacks bishop. Anyway the intent was to cause black to waste tempo by moving the Bf5 and then I follow up Bd3 offering up an exchange getting rid of blacks active bishop.Usually it's white who attacks on the kingside though, as he gets more control of the center. However, he can also attack on the queenside, and in that case black could attack on the kingside.
Lately I've been trying to play with c4 to strengthen my positional play. Of the three main pawn moves c4 seems the most positionally based. The only problem that I have with e4 is that it invites the sicilian which seems to equalize for black with best play. Again, c4 is the most positionally solid of the opening moves. It stakes a claim to the center with a pawn that is less valuable than either of the center pawns. My favorite opening move is probably d4. Some play it positionally but I prefer to head for a tactical game by playing the Trompowsky or Levitsky or Hopton attack. Perhaps the fact that I haven't used d4 on this site explains my lower than average rating. But I'm sure the experience I'm gaining from playing 1. c4 will eventually compensate for the blow to my ego.
the question doesnt arise atall to me, i have never played pk4!!
pk4?? thats no even a notation we are talking about e4 or d4
pk4 is the old descriptive notation ....its the same as e4.......pQ4 stands for d4