The mistake is 3. ... fxe5. Black can win the Pawn back with 3. ... Qe7.
It's still a bad line for Black, but not an immediate loss.
The mistake is 3. ... fxe5. Black can win the Pawn back with 3. ... Qe7.
It's still a bad line for Black, but not an immediate loss.
Just because an opening has a name doesn't mean it's good. Most of Black's responses to 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 have names and are very old openings, such as 2...Qe7 {Gunderam Defense.} and 2...Qf6 {Greco Defense.}, both of which are weak.
Damiano's Defense is really a gambit, so should have been called Damiano's Gambit. The catch is that although Black gets his pawn back, he gets behind 2 tempi and can't castle safely without losing material. I didn't realize how bad Black's positional evaluation was until I ran Stockfish. Even with the "McGregor Defense" (as I call it), the only viable response to 3. Nxe5, Black is down a pawn's worth of material and as far as I've run Stockfish, Black never recovers that material.
I ran Stockfish at depth 30 (= 15 full moves lookahead) and here were the top responses by both players in the "McGregor Defense":
There is a line I see from beginners a lot (even though I’m a beginner myself, I’d like to think I have better opening knowledge than most beginners),
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 f6
According to my Openings App, this is called the Damiano Defense, but I have always thought of it as a mistake because 3. Nxe5 fxe5 4. Qh5+ g6 5. Qxe5+ forking the King and Rook.
Is there something I’m missing here, is it meant to be played without ...fxe5, or is this simply unplayable?