END your 1.d4/London/closed game/positional woes forever with 1.d4 e5!? 2.dxe5 d6 3.exd6 Bxd6!

Sort:
Avatar of gik-tally
lassus_dinnao wrote:

What about 1.d6 move order?

UGH! stonewall

MAKE IT STOP! MAKE IT STOP!

I've won 1 out of 4 1.d3s. i hate such hypermodern vileness with every fiber of my being

pawn pushing ragga fraggas!

Avatar of Badchesserrr4486999
1983B-Boy написал:
lassus_dinnao wrote:

What about 1.d6 move order?

UGH! stonewall

MAKE IT STOP! MAKE IT STOP!

I've won 1 out of 4 1.d3s. i hate such hypermodern vileness with every fiber of my being

pawn pushing ragga fraggas!

You need positional stuff.
PERIOD.
Play the english opening.

Avatar of GYG
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:

You need positional stuff.
PERIOD.

Avatar of Badchesserrr4486999
GYG написал:
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:

You need positional stuff.
PERIOD.

You are 2800. You should know.

Avatar of gik-tally

I'm happy with this opening, have improved my accuracy to mid 80s with it on AVERAGE, even winging it as here. are sad haters trolling because miniatures from lower rated players are their sad live's worst butthurt? all i need to do to boost my rating is ditch the garbage scandinavian and commit to rousseau.

I'm thinking learning top tier danish MIGHT do something to help me learn dreaded fianchetto techniques and improve on my 5% or so losing stats with trusted friend king's gambit. i'll take those losing stats with THAT any day, such is my love for muzios.

I've never been this happy as black except at the start of my scandinavian gambit days. eff "pavnov transfer". that's a couple moves past scandinavian gambit!

like I said, I'm a mastermind, not QUITE logigician, small j, and my "big ?#" results yielded 92% innovative. i don't live in fantasy bubbles, or project when TROLLING is exactly what a trump voter does and ignores facts that give them butthurt, like my STELLAR results so far playing thing manna from heaven FOR ME line. take those pawns! they're only IN MY WAY

that i'm destroying players left and right in this "blah blah blah whimper whimper whimper excuse excuse excuse" "UNSOUND" blunder even if you listen to stalefish line makes it that much more delicious to rub in the face of pathetic self hating trolls.

i'm having the time of my life, now go cuddle with your my little pony plush toy when you cry yourselves to sleep sucking your thumb because some gambiteer whalloped you in 17 today.

HAHAHAHA!

give it to me baby! give it to me! not the pawn... the SPACE! all closed game plans are CANCELLED and you're on my turf grabbing the bait fishy

Avatar of gik-tally

92% accurate vs 1726

and there aren't any "you know your book better than your opponent" excuses flying here me figuring it out MY WAY
 
looking at the intro now, I see all that explosive mobility and initiative punishing another player for overextending their queen and giving me a ton of free development chasing miss priss. that's one of the things i hate about the scammed 'em avian... the knight trade forcing Qxd5 & 0-0-0 line. I like my queen to wait for her moment to do her thing when she can get away with it, or better yet already has team in place
 
84% accuracy against a 1722
keeping calm OUT OF BOOK here gave me the chance to get rid of that pesky despicable pawn and THEN steer it towards the sorry charlie tool set. I love it!
 
OK... I already posted my highest rated win which is ALSO my quickest one... funny how that works.
Avatar of gik-tally

it's not ALL sunshine playing this gambit

and I didn't fare better with 2...Bb4

but I'm happy with a 78% accuracy, if not getting stuck in a dreadful pawn pusher endgame

Avatar of Optimissed
1983B-Boy wrote:

back in the day, I used to score really well with the stonewal, often beating higher rated opponents and crushing ANYONE stupid enough to 0-0-0, but nowadays, everyone plays Nd2 and a lot of other newer lines. that's why I hate playing it... it was never my style to begin with, but easy to play as a 1400.

I won't play 1...d5 because I DESPISE fianchettos and the albin is less sound. I'm loving what i'm playing RIGHT NOW so much I think I found a life partner, even if it catches on and everyone starts playing stronger lines. y'all just have no clue just how much the open e&d files with rapid development and a nice tactical "tool kit" make me ecstatic. I KNEW this line was perfect for me BEFORE i started kicking way above average butt with it. it speaks MY LANGUAGE.

But only if white plays it wrongly. All white has to do is head for a kind of e4 - e5 line where black has misplayed. Playing ed is a mistake except when white has played Bf4. Then black's in a lot of trouble and can barely survive.

Avatar of 1Lindamea1
1983B-Boy написал:
lassus_dinnao wrote:

What about 1.d6 move order?

UGH! stonewall

MAKE IT STOP! MAKE IT STOP!

I've won 1 out of 4 1.d3s. i hate such hypermodern vileness with every fiber of my being

pawn pushing ragga fraggas!

What stonewall?

You get yourself an opportunity to escape giving white advantage against some particular setups
Avatar of gik-tally

that homework paid off! I was able to get a huge advantage in my next advance game before I blundered out of pawn frustration

were it not for that blunder, I would have aced this game
 
haters are COMPLETELY missing the point, YES, if white does his homework and plays accurately, it's possible to get an ADVANTAGE in this variation, but the majority of the time, it's a tactical blast and you're NEVER going to win your
"because you're playing THIS around 85% accuracy, having the time of your life, MOSTLY solving problems TACTICALLY, your greatest strength, and beating opponents 2 to 1, you are therefore WRONG"
 
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
 
the cognitive dissonance is strong with these haters. gambits really scare the crap out of you positional weinies. you'll say ANYTHING to make them go away, but they won't
 

at the 2000 level, white only has a 6% advantage in the main line and less after that. I'm FINE with those numbers! it's not the ratings that matters! it's playing MY GAME MY WAY! My stats in kings gambit are about 5% losing, but I still love it because I understand it and am able to crush opponents in a dozen moves a whole lot.

quit trying to impose your pawn pushing wussy style of play on me! you are not a klingon! you play chess like a vulcan wet nurse!

gik'tal = to the death

Avatar of gik-tally
worsethanfrank wrote:

This advice is gothamchess tier advice, leave the forums.

and you know where you can put that gatekeeping troll crap and rotate on it

Avatar of gik-tally

I swear people are DEAF! a "positional advantage" is a HINDRANCE FOR ME! you need to speak positional to EXPLOIT positional!!! I speak TACTICAL. This is why I hate the scandinavian so much! there's nothing wrong with it if you want to push pawns 80 boring quiet moves, but I DON'T! if it's positional, I'm probably going to lose. good thing for me that's not the ONLY path to victory.

you can keep arguing and making all the excuses in the world haters, but I'm STILL destroying everyone 2 to 1 and having fun. oh that's gotta drive you nuts! HAHAHAHAHA!!!!

and YES! I AM keeping score, a tally if you will... a 2:1 gik-tally (tal pun intended)

I didn't even have to PLAY this opening to fall in love. when I looked at that nice open center, first bishop out, and all the making stuff happen mobility with not FUGLY fianchettoed bishops, but a central pair aimed kingside, it just pushed my buttons AESTHETICALLY. over the board, if the gambit's accepted, I am TOTALLY IN THE ZONE. if opponents can't take me out, as they've done all those so miserable I quit playing over it stonewall years, NOW IT'S MY TURN TO PLAY MY GAME!

mothereff your pawn pushing mime with laryngitis positional closed useless crap openings! every chance I get, I'm making you play OUT IN THE OPEN against PIECES coming for your hide before you can hide

1.d4 is FIXED and you don't get a vote!

Avatar of illegalthingy
Gyg average accuracy 99.99%?
Avatar of gik-tally

Avatar of gik-tally

a bit of homework in the sidelines & challenging ones ought to bring the numbers up a couple percent. otherwise, haters are talking lies kids, these are the facts. don't live in a bubble!

looks like a3 is a move I really need to prep against at every stage. OK.

Avatar of RivertonKnight

I'm right there 1893B-Boy, I play the Englund alot also because it is fun, even giving the Queen up for 2 minors, or minor and a rook is exciting. But do realize that there is some pretty simple busts to the Englund that most people don't play

Avatar of gik-tally

new theory, drilled 1 round, will likely cause move order errors, oh well

1.d4 e5 2.Nc3 exd4 3.Qxd4 Nc6

4.Qd1 Nf6

_____5.Nf3 d5

_____5.Bf4 Bb4

_____5.e4 Bb4

_____5.Bg5 Bb4

4.Qe4+ Be7

_____5.Bg5 d5

_____5.Nd5 d6

_____5.Bf4 Nf6

_____5.Nf3 Nf6

4.Qa4 Bb4

_____5.Bd2 a6

_____5.Nf3 a6

_____5.e4 d6

_____5.Bf4 d6

4.Qd3 d5

_____5.Bf4 Nf6

_____5.Qxd5 Bd6

_____5.e4 d4

_____5.Nf3 d4

_____5.a3 d4

4.Qe3+ Be7

_____5. Nd5 d6

_____5.Nf3 d5

_____5.Qg3 Nb4

_____5.Bd2 Nf6 6.O-O-O d5

Avatar of gik-tally
RivertonKnight wrote:

I'm right there 1893B-Boy, I play the Englund alot also because it is fun, even giving the Queen up for 2 minors, or minor and a rook is exciting. But do realize that there is some pretty simple busts to the Englund that most people don't play

WAIT! you mean I just might have to PLAY SOME CHESS SOMETIMES?!!!

or learn some theory? I'm just fine with that, kicking more butt than losing without even trying right now.

I used to kick this much butt in the smith morra, now I just kick above average butt with it. boo hoo hoo. LOL

it's not "what I'm doing" that's important, it's NOT BEING FORCED to stonewall, and I loathe the stonewall with all my PTSD

it's EVERYONE'S responsibility to know theory. I just like that I'm out of white's theory, and they're in mine now, mostly. a3 players know what they're doing apparently

Avatar of AngryPuffer
Avatar of RivertonKnight

What I'm saying really is how long do you plan on being a 1600 player?