Forums

Help with developing opening repertoire...

Sort:
FrancisPoulenc

Hi. I'm a relatively new player; I learned when I was a kid but have only really been playing consistently for the last few months or so. I feel pretty confident about my improvement tactically, and usually by middlegame I feel pretty comfortable, but I still struggle with openings.

 

So I have two questions; 1. I often see opponents at my level make moves that are not main lines, nor a line I'm really familiar with, even if it's an opening I'm comfortable with. And if I had the time to really analyze it fully, I could understand why it wasn't maybe so sound, and play aginst it. But I usually play 10 min games, where time is of an issue. So my question is, besides learning openings by rote, is there a simpler or more abstract way of looking at specific moves in an opening- less in the way of what the move is doing, but more what it's not doing, so I can take advantage of it? I guess I'm looking for strategic advice- like, I know that f7/f2 is a weakness at the very beginning, but maybe if there are other similar ideas specific to different openings?

 

And 2. To more experienced players, if you might be able to provide some tips per my opening repertoire. I like to play very sharp lines and aggressive, Romantic, sacrifical play. However, I also want to find lines that will help me the most with regards to improving my play- rather than simply learning effective lines, I would like to be playing lines that teach a useful strategy, important concepts, something like that. I have mainly tried to stick to open games as much as possible for this purpose.

 

As White I always play e4, going to the Italian Game if possible. From there, I feel pretty comfortable with the Two Knights' Defense or Evans' Gambit. I play the Smith-Morra against the Sicilian. I have much more trouble with the French or Caro-Kann. 

As Black I respond to e4 with e5, aiming for similar lines as in my games as White. Against d4, I play Nf6, and some sort of Benoni. If I can get into the Benko gambit I feel very comfortable, but if something other than 2.c4 I dont have a lot of practice.

I would appreciate any tips or comments! 

kareldevries
see my comment on h4

What you would like to master would be very good. Problem is that what you ask isn't something you can't learn only out of a book. It takes lots and lots of practice and, more important, the ability to learn from previous mistakes.

And that last task is difficult. It's , certainly with things like Komodo, fritz or stockfish, to find the better move. But that won't help to become better, you need to understand why you lost, not what moves would have given the draw or win.
Seems a game of words but the difference is huge, the difference between a master and us simple club players.

I can almost hear you think "how the f*** does this bs answer help me?????"

I really don,t know , that why I didn't make it to become IM :-)
Sqod
FrancisPoulenc wrote:

So my question is, besides learning openings by rote, is there a simpler or more abstract way of looking at specific moves in an opening- less in the way of what the move is doing, but more what it's not doing, so I can take advantage of it?

As Black I respond to e4 with e5, aiming for similar lines as in my games as White. 

Your questions are so numerous and so deep that I'll just throw out a few thoughts.

Since you want to play sharp lines, countering 1. e4 with 1...e5 is not the best since it tends to be symmetrical and drawish. Use the Sicilian instead, which is asymmetrical, usually sharp, and usually decisive. Countering 1. d4 with 1...Nf6 is fine for tactics, though don't overlook 1...f5 also (Dutch Defense) if you want a response that is lesser known.

I assume you realize that every action in life has a strength and a weakness. So it is with chess moves. Some examples:

(1) 1. e4 e5 2. c3 prepares for a powerful pawn duo in the center with an upcoming d4, but c3 also blocked the QN from moving Nc3 and it took a move longer than usual, so Black can immediately exploit those two weaknesses with 2...d5 3. exd5 Qxd5, which centralizes his queen that can't be immediately driven off with Nc3, and equalizes with his intended ...d5 sooner than usual.

(2) 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nbd2, as in the recent thread (https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/did-i-just-refute-the-sicilian) seems to give White an advantage in that it doesn't block his c-pawn, but at the same time it blocks his QB.

(3) 1. g4 seems to be a threat to Black because as soon as Black plays the usual ...Nf6, g5 chases that knight off. However, Black can exploit the move by playing ...Nfe7 then ...Ngf5 to land right along side that pawn, rendering its attack useless at the same time the pawn will soon need to be defended with ...h3, and will have seriously weakened White's kingside.

Therefore if you understand the ideas, plans, strengths and weaknesses of each and every move in your repertoire, you'll often be able to spot and exploit out-of-book weak moves immediately. Having said that, though, such a robust repertoire takes a lot of work to develop, and the problem of finding good documentation on ideas and plans is big, and is a much-discussed topic...

()

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/what-to-look-for-when-making-a-plan

()

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-analysis/queen-sacrifice9

()

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/how-to-form-a-plan

()

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/middlegame-planning

()

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/how-do-you-come-up-with-plan-in-mg

()

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/where-to-learn-the-basic-quotideasquot-of-an-opening

 
FrancisPoulenc

Thank you all for the excellent comments!

 

@ Squod

I have been playing 1...e5 because I thought it would be wise to try to achieve the same game from both sides, for instructive purposes. I will look into the Dutch defense, it looks very interesting and sharp.

 

@IM pfren

That is very comforting to hear, because I feel solid in my plan to improve my tactical skills. Thank you for the advice!

Diakonia

Based on your rating, and after reviewing some of your games openings are the last thing you should be concerned about.  

Follw Opening Principles:

Control the center

Develop toward the center

Castle

Connect your rooks

When you are missing simple tactics, and dropping pieces why are you worried about an opening repertoire?

Sqod

Diakonia,

That's one way to look at it. (I didn't look at any of the OP's games.) However, another way to look at it is that if a person learns a certain type of position, or even the first few moves of an opening, it becomes much easier to know which tactics to watch out for, and makes for a stronger game overall. I'm with the OP: knowing even the start of some openings can't hurt unless he's going to memorize moves without knowing anything about them, which would be even worse in a sharp opening where the tactical continuation was hard to find over-the-board.

Diakonia
Sqod wrote:

Diakonia,

That's one way to look at it. (I didn't look at any of the OP's games.) However, another way to look at it is that if a person learns a certain type of position, or even the first few moves of an opening, it becomes much easier to know which tactics to watch out for, and makes for a stronger game overall. I'm with the OP: knowing even the start of some openings can't hurt unless he's going to memorize moves without knowing anything about them, which would be even worse in a sharp opening where the tactical continuation was hard to find over-the-board.

Good post sqod, and i understand where youre coming from with it.  But my reply is based on the OP's 2 questions, and the numerous posts on this same subject.  

The OP's first question i answered with my suggestion on Opening Principles.

The OP's second question is what i usually see with these posts: " I like to play very sharp lines and aggressive, Romantic, sacrifical play."  This is why i added what i did about missing simple tactics, and hanging pieces.  

kindaspongey

"If you find an opening here that appeals to you and you wish to find out more about it, the next step would be to obtain an introductory text devoted entirely to that subject." - GM John Emms in his 2006 introduction to basic opening principles, Discovering Chess Openings

"Throughout the book Emms uses excellently chosen examples to expand the readers understanding of both openings and chess in general. Thus equipped the student can carry this knowledge forward to study individual openings and build an opening repertoire. ... For beginning players, this book will offer an opportunity to start out on the right foot and really get a feel for what is happening on the board." - FM Carsten Hansen, reviewing the 2006 Emms book

https://web.archive.org/web/20140627114655/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen91.pdf