High reward gambit?

Sort:
ShmekWes
I love the sacrifice type of gameplay where you give small defeats for greater victories.What is a gambit that is really aggressive ? thank you.
kindaspongey

You might want to get: My First Chess Opening Repertoire for White

https://www.newinchess.com/media/wysiwyg/product_pdf/9033.pdf

https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/vincent-moret/

Maybe first read Discovering Chess Openings.

https://web.archive.org/web/20140627114655/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen91.pdf

fried_liver-attack
ShmekWes wrote:
I love the sacrifice type of gameplay where you give small defeats for greater victories.What is a gambit that is really aggressive ? thank you.

King's gambit is the one that comes to mind, yet there are other ones. Scotch gambit gives up one pawn for better development and sharp tactical lines. The Tennison Gambit, E4 D5 Nf3 is full of traps and is a lot of fun. For black the Trailer Counterattack is spectacular and very common to pull off.

kindaspongey

Traxler?

fried_liver-attack
kindaspongey wrote:

Traxler?

oops, stupid auto correct. Yeah

RussBell

http://www.thechesswebsite.com/top-7-aggressive-chess-openings/

for more gambits, see...

Chess Openings Resources for Beginners and Beyond...

https://www.chess.com/blog/RussBell/openings-resources-for-beginners-and-beyond

pirate6400

do you play fortnite

 

fried_liver-attack
pirate6400 wrote:

do you play fortnite

 

Nope, Pubg is better

Trexler3241
pirate6400 wrote:

do you play fortnite

 

DON’T DISCUSS THAT HERE!!

fried_liver-attack
Trexler3241 wrote:
pirate6400 wrote:

do you play fortnite

 

DON’T DISCUSS THAT HERE!!

Been a while since I've seen you here, and this is what I see

 

Prometheus_Fuschs
The danish gambit is really hard to counter but Im not sure if it’s sound.
fried_liver-attack
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
The danish gambit is really hard to counter but Im not sure if it’s sound.

if they take both pawns, then yes, if they play well, no

 

my137thaccount
fried_liver-attack wrote:
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
The danish gambit is really hard to counter but Im not sure if it’s sound.

if they take both pawns, then yes, if they play well, no

 

Taking both pawns is the refutation of the gambit...

https://www.chess.com/article/view/danish-cracker

MorphysMayhem

King's Gambit, Scotch Gambit, Evan's Gambit are all pretty good. 

fried_liver-attack
my137thaccount wrote:
fried_liver-attack wrote:
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
The danish gambit is really hard to counter but Im not sure if it’s sound.

if they take both pawns, then yes, if they play well, no

 

Taking both pawns is the refutation of the gambit...

https://www.chess.com/article/view/danish-cracker

Really? e4 e5 d4 exd4 c3 e5 is my line

my137thaccount
fried_liver-attack wrote:
my137thaccount wrote:
fried_liver-attack wrote:
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
The danish gambit is really hard to counter but Im not sure if it’s sound.

if they take both pawns, then yes, if they play well, no

 

Taking both pawns is the refutation of the gambit...

https://www.chess.com/article/view/danish-cracker

Really? e4 e5 d4 exd4 c3 e5 is my line

That's probably easier to play, but surely taking the pawns must be more critical if you can defend the complications.

fried_liver-attack
my137thaccount wrote:
fried_liver-attack wrote:
my137thaccount wrote:
fried_liver-attack wrote:
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
The danish gambit is really hard to counter but Im not sure if it’s sound.

if they take both pawns, then yes, if they play well, no

 

Taking both pawns is the refutation of the gambit...

https://www.chess.com/article/view/danish-cracker

Really? e4 e5 d4 exd4 c3 e5 is my line

That's probably easier to play, but surely taking the pawns must be more critical if you can defend the complications.

Yeah, see, I can't defend well. I can build up solid positions, I can all out attack, I can play endgames, yet if my opponent gets an attack going, I'm screwed

kindaspongey
fried_liver-attack  wrote:

... e4 e5 d4 exd4 c3 e5 is my line



Prometheus_Fuschs
fried_liver-attack escribió:
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
The danish gambit is really hard to counter but Im not sure if it’s sound.

if they take both pawns, then yes, if they play well, no

 

I was indeed thinking about the line where black takes both pawns, if your oponent doesn't know the opening the he probably will take both in quick time formats.

followthebuzzard

Personally i don't think there is such a 'high reward' gambit as it presumes that to play said gambit will most of the time win the game at hand and that simply does not happen....