2. g3 seems that black has wasted his first move and made his pawn structure weak.
i have manage my own opening( i call it "hide and seek" opening)
Sort:
this is certainly not ok for black. It is pure nonsense, white is clearly better already.
i agree, a4 is a poor move
Such kind of openings can be invented many :
The question is are they enough good.
Yes , this looks serious - some kind of Benony with Na6.Final position is good for black, indeed.
In a benoni structure that knight on a6 definitely make sense but i wonder what the plan is after 2.e4...
Pembukaan "petak umpet" ya Kang?
:)
Menarik juga...
conor_o_d wrote:
The game has trasposed in a sort of shmidt beneni, usually concidered += but playable. But why 4.d5? W is again entering a benoni structure which gives meaning to the Na6. 4.Nf3 looks more to the point to me.
Aug 28, 2011
0
#13
black might just play d5 then i havent really looked at it too deeply
Aug 28, 2011
0
#14
DrDCameOutSwinging wrote:
this is certainly not ok for black. It is pure nonsense, white is clearly better already.
Really? Go ahead and prove it...
creates weak pawns and falls down in development
conor_o_d wrote:
black might just play d5 then i havent really looked at it too deeply
i think that 4...d5?! just blows the centre open while behind in development, giving W an even bigger advantage.After 5.exd5 cxd4 (exd5 blunders a pawn) 6.Nxd4 exd5 of course there is still a long game ahead but W is definitely much better. Sacrificing a pawn with 5.exd5 Nf6?! looks bad expecially if W continues without grabbing immediately and play 6.Bb4+! Bd7 7.dxe3.(everything is not computer checked)
Of course it's possible to play 1...Na6 and obtain a playable position but i think that in no way you can make it look like a pleasant experience 
Since the OP still has a sense of wonder and discovery about the game, I think he should run with it and play creatively. I commend conor on helping him find a way to reorder the moves to make them playable as well throwing out some other interesting ideas.
Aug 28, 2011
0
#18
GrandmasterAdam wrote:
creates weak pawns and falls down in development
That is not proof. If you're so sure this opening is "busted" then load up a pgn with some actual analysis and let's have at it. I'm not saying blacks system is wonderful, I'm just saying you'll have to prove it if you face it and as far as I can see there is nothing completely awful about it. 1...a5 is certainly odd, but it's not lost.
i'm sure, many GM is trying to discover all good opening that makes almost all good openings already named.
but i've discover an opening that you may like it or not:
hide and seek opening
this is opening for black, it will attack in the queenside and hide your king in the kingside.
i learn chess independendtly so my knowledge is too low to hit one opening with the oposite,
so if you want to, lets discuss it. :)