The only thing that proves is that dummies like you hang pawns on the second move.
Is anything better for me than the Parham?
Sort:
It's actually a know gambit. White has to play carefully, and black scores much better than white does.
Yes, but white can pull ahead.
30 pages huh...
whatupyodog wrote:
Lol. You hang a piece and instead of taking it he manages to hang his queen. And you say your better than all of us.
The best part of this thread: watching Christiansoldiers hilarious attemmpts to refute the opening at page 28 by constantly hanging pieces.
The OP will single-handedly climb to the top of fide list by playing only e4 and Qh5 if black plays e5
sanan22 wrote:
The OP will single-handedly climb to the top of fide list by playing only e4 and Qh5 if black plays e5
There is no doubt about it, but ATM he does have to get off his high horse- else he will not be able to climb the ELO lists on horseback.
Helzeth wrote:
The best part of this thread: watching Christiansoldiers hilarious attemmpts to refute the opening at page 28 by constantly hanging pieces.
LOL! 
So what were saying here is there's no good way to combat the Parham? The most current line shows black going down a piece by move 9.
Yes, the parham is a forced win for white.
Hell it worked for Nakamura
e5 needs to go down in the books as a question mark.
Yet another game that proves the parham is better than the KG.
Whoever plays the Parham attack as white, and the Paris Hilton defence as black, is poised to be the next World Champion.
FYI the Paris Hilton defence goes 1.e4 Nd6! and Black already has a big advantage.
Idk, apparently christiansoldier is going to eventually be as good as you pfren (I didn't make this up, he said he is going to be an IM), so I guess this opening can beat IM's.
If that is so than this proves the parham is worse, from an actual game I played a while ago.