Okay, so what are the reasons for telling the Bongcloud good where it's the worst opening?
Is The Bongcloud good?

Playing the Bongcloud destroys your chance of casting- you need to the artificial castle. It also makes your king vulnerable and also blocks the Queen and the Kingside Bishop from moving.

1. King activity
2. A prophylactic move that prevents you from moving either the bishop or queen out too early
3. defends the d3 and f3 squares, which are weak after e4.
Ludicrous + Absurd reasons. I just become (!!) by seeing these comments.

I'll play some live games with you if you want to prove you wrong (unrated plz)
Engines, especially NNUE Stockfish evaluates this is a worse opening.

1. King activity
2. A prophylactic move that prevents you from moving either the bishop or queen out too early
3. defends the d3 and f3 squares, which are weak after e4.
Ludicrous + Absurd reasons. I just become (!!) by seeing these comments.
-2.21. Plus, "A prophylactic move". (!!). WHAT!!. You have risks to be skewered. Actually

engines can't evaluate it properly because their programmers coded in king activity as a bad thing when it's not.
It's not the thing of King activity. King activity is needed in endgames, where you can guard your pieces.

It can't be captured, but it can be skewered and checked and checkmated. Plus, the KING IS THE MOST IMPORTANT PIECE, NOT THE MOST POWERFUL PIECE. The Queen is the most powerful. The King is more important than a knight or Bishop, but less powerful than them. OKAY?

chill it's just a meme lol, and why shouldn't you be promoting the bongcloud, as you would crush the then numerous people who play the bongcloud against you? :/

Absolutely NO,the king should be active in the endgame NOT,the middlegame or opening you will probably never see a GM play the bongcloud(unless you're Hikaru Nakamura) and you will probably never see a player playing the bongcloud unless you are facing a 0 rated player,or if you are watching Nigel Short vs. Jan Tinman where Short masterminded a brilliant king March forcing Tinman to resign (But Short didn't play the bongcloud) still the bongcloud is very bad opening.

Absolutely NO,the king should be active in the endgame NOT,the middlegame or opening you will probably never see a GM play the bongcloud(unless you're Hikaru Nakamura) and you will probably never see a player playing the bongcloud unless you are facing a 0 rated player,or if you are watching Nigel Short vs. Jan Tinman where Short masterminded a brilliant king March forcing Tinman to resign (But Short didn't play the bongcloud) still the bongcloud is very bad opening.
magnus carlsen also did it against hikaru

Absolutely NO,the king should be active in the endgame NOT,the middlegame or opening you will probably never see a GM play the bongcloud(unless you're Hikaru Nakamura) and you will probably never see a player playing the bongcloud unless you are facing a 0 rated player,or if you are watching Nigel Short vs. Jan Tinman where Short masterminded a brilliant king March forcing Tinman to resign (But Short didn't play the bongcloud) still the bongcloud is very bad opening.
Yes. You are correct.

Absolutely NO,the king should be active in the endgame NOT,the middlegame or opening you will probably never see a GM play the bongcloud(unless you're Hikaru Nakamura) and you will probably never see a player playing the bongcloud unless you are facing a 0 rated player,or if you are watching Nigel Short vs. Jan Tinman where Short masterminded a brilliant king March forcing Tinman to resign (But Short didn't play the bongcloud) still the bongcloud is very bad opening.
magnus carlsen also did it against hikaru
ik. that was a very interesting match. hikaru just copied magnus' moves. and result = draw!
So sad seeing legendary old posts be ruined by little 12 year old attention seekers
There are many 12 year olds that can destroy you in chess.
That has nothing to do with the original post.
And neither does your gripe about people "ruining" the post.
And neither is ur input.
LOL.as useless as this? .