Is the Yugoslav attack a good attack?
Sort:
It depends, to make this as short and sweet as possible, it is considered one of the most If not the most aggressive openings in chess for both sides. If you like complications and like to wade through the deep waters of this opening then go ahead and try it, though hardly anyone plays the dragon. Not that the dragon is bad, just that there is way to much theory.
Not sure how much of it is relevant, but you might be interested in this: http://www.chess.com/article/view/attack-and-defense-in-the-dragon
Both philosophically and practically, I liken the question to "Is sex fun even when not technically accurate?"
ok thanks all :)
cowpatties-1 wrote:
Both philosophically and practically, I liken the question to "Is sex fun even when not technically accurate?"
what the hell is that supposed to mean "not technically accurate"
Bobby Fischer can refute a lot of openings. Just because Bobby FIscher can beat it doesn't mean your online chess opponent can.
Bobby Fischer said (about the Yugoslov) "I had it down to a science: sac, sac, mate!"
Please Sign Up to comment.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
i got nothing to say, i just want to know...