Lazard Gambit Trap

Sort:
Avatar of Professor_Gobbles

Avatar of visheshjindal

good one

Avatar of Professor_Gobbles
ChesswithNickolay wrote:

The only problem is, no one plays Nd2.

still cool tho

Avatar of Professor_Gobbles

I wish more people played ¨unique¨ openings. It would make the game a lot more enjoyable. It gets tiring seeing the ruy lopez and italian game every time I play.

Avatar of vadimvasichev

привет

 

Avatar of pfren
ChesswithNickolay wrote:

The only problem is, no one plays Nd2.

 

If I knew that Black would respond with 2...e5? I would play it all the time.

Avatar of miskit_mistake

https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1243036

Well known brevity

Avatar of InsertInterestingNameHere
Professor_Gobbles wrote:

I wish more people played ¨unique¨ openings. It would make the game a lot more enjoyable. It gets tiring seeing the ruy lopez and italian game every time I play.

The reason this doesn’t happen, is because those “unique” openings are sub-optimal. Why would you purposely play a worse opening?

Avatar of Professor_Gobbles
InsertInterestingNameHere wrote:
Professor_Gobbles wrote:

I wish more people played ¨unique¨ openings. It would make the game a lot more enjoyable. It gets tiring seeing the ruy lopez and italian game every time I play.

The reason this doesn’t happen, is because those “unique” openings are sub-optimal. Why would you purposely play a worse opening?

There is hardly a difference in some "suboptimal" openings than "good" openings. With computers these days, we can now see that openings like the nimzowitsch defense that were previously considered straight out "bad" are actually quite good. Besides, you'll probably have a much better win rate playing a decent "pet" opening then a well known one because your opponent probably won't have studied it. 

Avatar of Professor_Gobbles

Playing only "traditional" openings can limit your potential severely 

Avatar of InsertInterestingNameHere

I agree with you 100%, but that doesn’t change that, on paper, something like the queen’s gambit is just better than nd2.

Avatar of Professor_Gobbles
InsertInterestingNameHere wrote:

I agree with you 100%, but that doesn’t change that, on paper, something like the queen’s gambit is just better than nd2.

yep