Most Recommended Opening for White

Sort:
Avatar of KandMDublin

Hi guys, Happy New Year!

I am fairly new to chess and still with a lot to learn how to play better.

My biggest struggle - as probably 99% of chess players - is understanding how to open and develop my pieces without making compromising mistakes since the beginning.

On this note, I was wondering if you guys have any highly recommended opening for White?

More precisely, openings which are quite standardly conservative but also leave room for attack. (so no too aggressive nor too defensive).

Thanks in advance for any help you might want to give me.

Matteo

Avatar of baddogno

Probably e4, and then if your opponent replies e5,  go Nf3 and into the Italian game.

Avatar of KandMDublin

Thanks baddogno, that's what I used to do. Then I got intrigued by the London System, which I found interesting, but sometimes it led me to quite awkward positioning. 

thanks for your reply!

Avatar of nklristic

Here is everything I can say on this subject:

https://www.chess.com/blog/nklristic/surviving-the-opening-first-steps-to-chess-improvement

In short, the most important is to follow the opening principles and don't memorize too much of the opening lines (as your opponent will not play the main line most of the time). Many people don't recommend system like openings - like the London because you will play the exact same moves whatever black throws at you, and by doing that you will not gain experience in various positions as white.

Avatar of Uninterrupted_Chess

You will get your every answer regarding opening theory here :-

https://www.chess.com/openings

g3 is quite interesting happy.png

 

Avatar of blueemu

At the 1000 level, openings are the least of your concerns.

Avatar of KandMDublin
nklristic wrote:

Here is everything I can say on this subject:

https://www.chess.com/blog/nklristic/surviving-the-opening-first-steps-to-chess-improvement

In short, the most important is to follow the opening principles and don't memorize too much of the opening lines (as your opponent will not play the main line most of the time). Many people don't recommend system like openings - like the London because you will play the exact same moves whatever black throws at you, and by doing that you will not gain experience in various positions as white.

Thanks nklristic! This is the kind of advice I was looking for. I will read your post with much attention. Thanks very much for your comment and help!

Avatar of KandMDublin
Uninterrupted_Chess wrote:

You will get your every answer regarding opening theory here :-

https://www.chess.com/openings

g3 is quite interesting

 

Thanks for the link: I have been there! 

Avatar of KandMDublin
blueemu wrote:

At the 1000 level, openings are the least of your concerns.

ok thanks. So what should you recommend? nklristic advised about opening principles; is there anything else you would like to add? 

Avatar of nklristic

No problem, I am glad to help. happy.png

By the way, if you like that one, you can read the rest if you wish. I would especially recommend the general guide, if you don't mind me giving you the link:

https://www.chess.com/blog/nklristic/the-beginners-tale-first-steps-to-chess-improvement

In it you might find how to get to some intermediate level, or at least how did I do it. Every aspect of the guide is further explained in separate articles (they are actually linked inside the guide if you are interested on some specific topic I've mentioned)

Avatar of KandMDublin
nklristic wrote:

No problem, I am glad to help. 

By the way, if you like that one, you can read the rest if you wish. I would especially recommend the general guide, if you don't mind me giving you the link:

https://www.chess.com/blog/nklristic/the-beginners-tale-first-steps-to-chess-improvement

In it you might find how to get to some intermediate level, or at least how did I do it. Every aspect of the guide is further explained in separate articles (they are actually linked inside the guide if you are interested on some specific topic I've mentioned)

I will definitely have a look at that as well! Tons to review! Very helpful, much appreciated, really! Cheers!

Avatar of KandMDublin
GambitHawk wrote:

The Botez Gambit seems to be quite the popular opening for lower level.

Especially if it is a joke, isn't it? happy.png

Avatar of nklristic

You're welcome. Have a great time improving your game. happy.png

Avatar of LeiJChess

For openings, I can recommend the Italian or the Scotch, which both seem decent openings for the beginner and intermediate level. However, the best advice that can be given is still just to practice tactics and avoid blundering. That alone is enough to bring a beginner to almost intermediate level. This is why it is commonly said in chess that it is only when chess players become advanced, nearing the 2000 rating, that studying chess theory becomes important. Having an understanding of openings and which ones to play is useful for every level, but there are more important factors. 

Avatar of blueemu
KandMDublin wrote:
blueemu wrote:

At the 1000 level, openings are the least of your concerns.

ok thanks. So what should you recommend? nklristic advised about opening principles; is there anything else you would like to add? 

Tactics (pins, forks, skewers, overloads, decoying and diverting, interference, etc). Model mates (corridor mate, smothered mate, Greco's, Lolli's, Legal's, Morphy's, Anderssen's mate, epaulette mate, etc). Basic endgames (not as in "how to mate with a King and Rook vs King", but as in "how to win a King and Pawn endgame, or a Rook and Pawn vs Rook ending"). Pawn structure, and the influence that it exherts on middle-game planning.

Avatar of KandMDublin
LeiJChess wrote:

For openings, I can recommend the Italian or the Scotch, which both seem decent openings for the beginner and intermediate level. However, the best advice that can be given is still just to practice tactics and avoid blundering. That alone is enough to bring a beginner to almost intermediate level. This is why it is commonly said in chess that it is only when chess players become advanced, nearing the 2000 rating, that studying chess theory becomes important. Having an understanding of openings and which ones to play is useful for every level, but there are more important factors. 

Thank you!

Avatar of KandMDublin
blueemu wrote:
KandMDublin wrote:
blueemu wrote:

At the 1000 level, openings are the least of your concerns.

ok thanks. So what should you recommend? nklristic advised about opening principles; is there anything else you would like to add? 

Tactics (pins, forks, skewers, overloads, decoying and diverting, interference, etc). Model mates (corridor mate, smothered mate, Greco's, Lolli's, Legal's, Morphy's, Anderssen's mate, epaulette mate, etc). Basic endgames (not as in "how to mate with a King and Rook vs King", but as in "how to win a King and Pawn endgame, or a Rook and Pawn vs Rook ending"). Pawn structure, and the influence that it exherts on middle-game planning.

Thanks a lot!

Avatar of ChampoftheBepoCamp

Play f4 bird's eye opening; Leningrad style and the dutch defense; Leningrad variation as black. I got over 1300+ rapid with the POWER OF THE BIRD in a week (1027-1300+) and am pushing 1400+. I started chess like 3 months ago, but I do not have membership or a study plan FEAR THE BIRD

Avatar of JackRoach

I'd say e4 and maybe scotch game/italian game. Played the scotch as a true beginner and italian game I play now. They are both funner than the London System in my opinion.