My Opening Invention

statisitics say that white has a slight advantage. something like 5%(rough I can look it up but thats about right) so if something is 50 50 then black has gained ground. why when people say a position has given equal chances its not good for white.

yep i have multple times. I have chessbase 2012 opening book , megabase blah blah blah. king's gambit a player is often playing for all 3 results. 
it is a "good' opening in that it fits into a logical struture that can be utilized later in other openings where white plays f4 later. it teaches development and logical attacks.
Blacks wins are also a bit skewed due to the number of lower rated players trying to play it against higher rated ones who arent fooled by it due to the forcing lines that are easy to remember.
if it is so bad for white do you really think Carlsen and Nakamura would play it in serious touraments and events against serious players 

BIG BIG BIG difference when nakamura played it

he was 2657 playing someone who was 2642 it was 2005 oh and he LOST!! so he was 17 and his  self confidence bordered on arrogance. he was not close to wher ehe is now and actually after this and another embarrassment he decided to get serious about openings study and well. he is top 10...

When your playing the top players in the world you do NOT mess around. The risk is too great and the cost too much from a rating perspective. drop below 10 and your invites drop and your income as well.

this is also 2012! so when was the last time he played it since he was 2700 or ANY 2700 played the patzer opening in a serious tournament? dont worry I will wait.....

I can point at multiple times GMS have played the kings gambit in serious events at 2700 level in 2012 alone.... 

The results tell the tail Nakamura LOST (::I was better but lost because I tried to hard to win from an EQUAL POSITION!!::) and he drew against players he was clearly more talented than and just a better player than. 
Has he attempted this openings since his 2005 debacle?
Has Nakramura played it in any event?

Has ANY titled master played it in ANY serious event since 2012?

I have games of GM Kamsky played 1 Na3 2. Nh3 against everything black played on ICC blitz. 

Your support of this based on TWO!!!!!! games played by a young GM where he lost and drew and using this as the crux of an argument is just absurd. Can you expect anyone to take you or anyone that supports the Patzer opening seriously based on this? National masters , International Masters, Grandmasters have said the samething about 2. Qh5 and they are just told by class players they are wrong... It reminds me of a scene in the movie "the waterboy" Where adam sandler got in an argument with the teacher saying "but momma said,...!"

No, it has to do with the fact my name isn't Russian.

I think it would be great to take lessons from an IM.  You go on later to trash him more and then say he's not even a GM, but you're not a titled player at all.  IM pfren seems to be offering debate, not just slinging insults.

On the original subject, here is the opening I created.  I call it the Scared Chicken Defense:

Bobby Fischer would never think like this. It was all about imgination for him. The risks were worth it.

Most major GM's consider the KG unsound. This includes Garry Kasparov.

the problem firepower is that many of those lines are VERY sharp. and one slip things go sideways and you lose. Players at this level spend hours prepping for a game and learning modern theory (see the aronian-mcshane game) and try to find a critical move to challenge their opponent ina line they played in the past but didnt play accurately and might have forgotten the result or not considered an option because the game turned out favorably for them. 

One thing that i have noticed in recent years is that top players are becoming a moving target. They are playing a large number of systems so players cannt surprise them as easily especially the lower rated 2660 fish (jk) Ivanchuk plays everything, Magnus is hard to predict, Aronian too. THe players that are more predictible like Rajabov and his king's indian struggle at times because they can get caught in a 'trap'.

Anywayt to answer your question my guess is the game played today was a trick because Naka saw his opponent played something against it that wasnt normal and wanted to challenge him in it. 

The interesting question is what Naka had in mind after 6.c4 Nb4 7.d4 Bf5, which seems to be the most challenging reply?

But his opponent did not bother checking out, played the "easy" move 6...Nf6 and had next to zero trouble equalizing.

Been done before. I believe it is a Caro-Kann variation. You are not the first to come up with it so you can't name it. Besides I think it already has a name.

Ya I suspect it was an attempt by Naka to surprise his opponent and try to catch him out of his main theory OR keep some prep hidden for a bigger game later perhaps. 

7 pages of comments? Are all trolls this well fed here?

Only those who deserved to be trolled.

Isn't that the pot calling the kettle back?

I know more about the opening than 99.99% of the players at my local club .

So, there are 10,001 players at your club, and only one knows more about THE opening? By the way, I love trolls.

As to why, apparently you didn't read my last line.

I don't think any of you are intelligent enough to get that this a joke.

You would think someone who plays chess would be a little more perceptive.

It's not trolling when I upset you. It's only trolling when I try.

Is there a name for 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 a6? it came to me one as i was searching for d4 alternatives....{so i didn't copy it from sb else} do you think its good?it can lead to benoni lines and it can surely take your opponent by surprise....