New Opening - ATROCIOUS OPENING - for White and Black - no way to be escaped

Sort:
Philly_door

Here are 2 games - with white and  black - one i lost, the other won :

 




Philly_door
doduobird123 wrote:

That opening is trash.

Can you try to refute it ?

TetsuoShima

in the first game just d5 instead of c4 and white is already better.

Philly_door
Oran_perrett wrote:

i can refute it by simply saying play e4/d4/c4 develop normally and attack that atrocious excuse for a developed kingside

He, he ! "  atrocious " . I just wondered how to name the new opening . So thanks for the idea - this is ATROCIOUS OPENING !

Philly_door

Here is one more example :



TetsuoShima

so what up with d5 against the first f6 and d6??

Is it not good?? i mean im not a calculating monster like you guys but to me its winning, tell me at least why its not working.

Philly_door
TetsuoShima wrote:

so what up with d5 against the first f6 and d6??

Is it not good?? i mean im not a calculating monster like you guys but to me its winning, tell me at least why its not working.

The opening is just invented - it will take some time to nitty-gritty the other lines .

skakmadurinn

This is rubbish. Play a real opening instead.

x-5058622868

Interesting. Why don't you castle though or keep castling as an option instead of moving your king?

Philly_door
Sunshiny wrote:

Interesting. Why don't you castle though or keep castling as an option instead of moving your king?

Castling is cept as possibility, untill possible, but the main idea is the rook to stay on " h " for eventual attack to kingside .

x-5058622868

Yes. I see in the third one the king needed to move to swing the queen over.

KillLogiC

Would like to play with it and to prove that that opening defies the basic principles of the opening.

Daniel90

Daeth is that you?

KillLogiC

KillLogiC

The idea being is to break open the center and attack the king. Or to create potential weaknesses on g5 square for the knight.

Irontiger

Wait...

How did you get your rating of 1737, if you believe this kind of thing is remotely playable ?

Cidragon

very interesting opening. funny how in all the game the oponnent use almost the same pawn structure and no play for refute that opening.

in first look like you going to use that opening for strengthen the king position and next use attack with all.

KillLogiC

Im wondering also.. but its also possible. Ive played players like this OTB with unorthodox style, with good tactics but weak in basic principles.

Cidragon

i think you need try it in a 15|10 game or 20 minutes games because 5 min games don't say to much.

TetsuoShima
Irontiger wrote:

Wait...

How did you get your rating of 1737, if you believe this kind of thing is remotely playable ?

probably the smartest post in the entire thread !!!!