That opening is trash.
Can you try to refute it ?
i can refute it by simply saying play e4/d4/c4 develop normally and attack that atrocious excuse for a developed kingside
He, he ! " atrocious " . I just wondered how to name the new opening . So thanks for the idea - this is ATROCIOUS OPENING !
so what up with d5 against the first f6 and d6??
Is it not good?? i mean im not a calculating monster like you guys but to me its winning, tell me at least why its not working.
so what up with d5 against the first f6 and d6??
Is it not good?? i mean im not a calculating monster like you guys but to me its winning, tell me at least why its not working.
The opening is just invented - it will take some time to nitty-gritty the other lines .
Interesting. Why don't you castle though or keep castling as an option instead of moving your king?
Castling is cept as possibility, untill possible, but the main idea is the rook to stay on " h " for eventual attack to kingside .
Would like to play with it and to prove that that opening defies the basic principles of the opening.
The idea being is to break open the center and attack the king. Or to create potential weaknesses on g5 square for the knight.
Wait...
How did you get your rating of 1737, if you believe this kind of thing is remotely playable ?
very interesting opening. funny how in all the game the oponnent use almost the same pawn structure and no play for refute that opening.
in first look like you going to use that opening for strengthen the king position and next use attack with all.
Here are 2 games - with white and black - one i lost, the other won :