Yeh I c ur point butt I dnt rlly agree 2 ful extant wit ur reesens 4 h8 pour gramer
People playing the queen early
Sort:
"XPLAYERJX wrote:
Their is nothing wrong with my english
Lol. You picked the wrong "their" in the sentence. It should be "there"
If you need any explanations, Ill be sure to tell you why
BoardOfWar wrote:
I really, really don't like bringing her out early but I saw it as the absolute best move here. I wound up controlling the center all game and got into dead even draw with a higher rated opponent.
Still - yeah, I really hate having to do it. I like using the queen as a powerful supporting piece until the time is right to strike deep into the enemy's camp.
I like people taking the time to post their game!
If I may give you suggestion you should work more on combinations. You had a couple of interesting choices during your match, incluing piece sacrifice, that would have open up your opponent's position like knife through butter.
Check some Mikhail Tal chess games on youtube, you will love them ;)
so speaking proper english equals being a grammar nazi? learn how to write and be a decent human being.
[COMMENT DELETED]
Well, I'm just a beginner actually, but I also don't like seeing player who brought the queen so early. Well, Scandinavian defense or whatever it is~
I actually agrees with the forum page maker. It's pretty annoying, and boring cause we just chase off the queen and eventually~, yeah you know.
Still 2.Qh5 is better countered with Nc6
he will retreat to 3.Qf3, reneweing threat on f7~, and you just Nf6, blocking the mate, etc, etc.....~~~
Jun 16, 2015
0
#68
Aircalibur wrote:
Well, I'm just a beginner actually, but I also don't like seeing player who brought the queen so early. Well, Scandinavian defense or whatever it is.
Well, most kids here in scandinavia are taught to play the scandinavian. The idea is to let the dominant alphawoman go out early and prove that she's stronger than those teeny-weeny knights and bishops.
If the opponent takes her, the coach will say: Don't worry, you will get a new one later.
cyed wrote:
Playing the Queen early is a clear indication that your opponent is a patzer. Enjoy the easy win and move along.
This.
I had a game once where my opponent played out his queen but in the end I gave up 3 pawns and he had to play his queen back to d1. Meanwhile he had nothing developed and I had rooks with semi open files, castled and my queen and all my minor pieces where developed.
The tempo's you can gain on attacking the queen with your minor pieces makes someone a patzer when he relies only on his queen
I know that people playing their queen early is m biggest weakness. The queen alot of times will destroy a big chunck of my army. if you threten the queen they simply move it back. On the flip side they tend to have a lack of devolpment
These people are the worst. Up there with serial killers and school shooters.
YoungPatzer wrote:
Aircalibur wrote:
Well, I'm just a beginner actually, but I also don't like seeing player who brought the queen so early. Well, Scandinavian defense or whatever it is.
Well, most kids here in scandinavia are taught to play the scandinavian. The idea is to let the dominant alphawoman go out early and prove that she's stronger than those teeny-weeny knights and bishops.
If the opponent takes her, the coach will say: Don't worry, you will get a new one later.
get a new one later, hahahaha!
Leaving out whole words and not breaking a post into sentences makes it difficult to understand. Smart people can figure it out, after a few re-reads, but his ideas are worth expressing well. 10-20 seconds to read through before you post, that's it.
As for there, their, they're, its, it's, to, too, and so on, yes, in that case I was intentionally being a d-ck. I understand it doesn't invalidate an otherwise intelligent argument.