Pirc Defense


The pirc defense is not good for black :) it's like to play King's indian defence without c4 ( it's good for white) but, if you want to learn it for blitz games, that's ok. For formal games (for black) i recommend Sicilian, Caro - Kann , or something like this :) Good luck :)

The best way to learn an opening is not asking here (or maybe just for specific variations, but not an entire opening).
See the former comment, very helpful...
I recommend u to purchase a good book.
"Pirc alert" is thought to be a classic, but maybe u could search for more recent work.
The excellent romanian author Mihail Marin juste released a book on it, and maybe The Pirc "move by move" is a good one.

Summerscale's "Killer Opening repertoire" is mostly 1.d4, 2Nf3 stodge isn't it?!, guess "Stodge repertoire" wouldn't have sold as well :), but any way white lines. As the "150 attack" lines you mention, but not sure how typical for the pirc this is. On the other hand don't play the pirc for black, so not really sure what is typical.

Summerscale's "Killer Opening repertoire" is mostly 1.d4, 2Nf3 stodge isn't it?!, guess "Stodge repertoire" wouldn't have sold as well :), but any way white lines. As the "150 attack" lines you mention, but not sure how typical for the pirc this is. On the other hand don't play the pirc for black, so not really sure what is typical.
1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 g6 3.Nc3 d6 4.e4 followed by Be3-Qd2 and we transpose into attack 150.
... "Pirc alert" is thought to be a classic, but maybe u could search for more recent work. ...
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627122350/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen123.pdf
... and maybe The Pirc "move by move" is a good one.
https://www.newinchess.com/media/wysiwyg/product_pdf/7604.pdf
... The excellent romanian author Mihail Marin juste released a book on it, ...
https://www.newinchess.com/media/wysiwyg/product_pdf/7755.pdf
"One particular approach to opening repertoire management is the use of universal systems, ... The use of such systems can enable a player to reduce the amount of opening theory he needs to study, and to reach positions of a type he is familiar with and enjoys playing. It is to the pros and cons of this approach that we now turn. ... it is rather more difficult for Black to adopt a universal system, ... The most popular one ... I will discuss in the next section. ... I refer to the King's Indian/Pirc/Modern complex. These lines are characterized by a kingside fianchetto, with such moves as ...g6, ...Bg7, ....d6, ...Nf6, etc. ... The lack of early central contact ... means that there is little chance of violent early contact knocking the player out of his preferred scheme. ..." - FM Steve Giddins (2003)
A Practical Black Repertoire with Nf6, g6, d6
https://www.newinchess.com/media/wysiwyg/product_pdf/7655.pdf
https://www.newinchess.com/media/wysiwyg/product_pdf/7632.pdf
... The Pirc shares a lot of similarities to the KID. ... If you want a more introductory look at it, "Winning Chess Openings", by Yasser Seirawan uses it as the primary recommendation for black (it is not an exhaustive look at it, but is good for an introduction).
If I remember correctly, the King's Indian is suggested to the reader as a reaction to 1 d4 etc.
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627132508/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen173.pdf

Pirc actually shares very few similarities with King's Indian defense , and only superficial ones.The initial Black pawn structure is the same but with the white c-pawn still on c2 and not on c4 , we are talking for 2 very different openings.
King's Indian Defense, Normal Variation
Pirc, Austrian Attack
Yep, nothing similar about those lines at all ...

Think going to regret stepping into argument, but agree with DeirdeSkype there isn't much similarity between Austrian attack Pirc/modern and the classical kingsindian. In the kingsindian there is much more counterplay possibilities against d4. The difference is enough that personally happy to play classical KingsIndian but avoid pirc/modern positions.
For balance as a sicilian player don't see much to worry about after 1.e4 c5 2Nc3 Nc6 3Bb5 Nd4, or 2Na3.

lol , it is funny that even your attempt to be sarcastic is a total failure.
Yes , nothing similar at all and if you see something similar it's because you understand nothing.
But please , don't be discouraged , try to be sarcastic again.
Oh, did my sarcasm hurt your feelings? Don't worry, you can lash out all you want. You are still a troll.
For the record, "similar" means "resembling without being identical". If you cannot see the similarities, you understand less about chess than you let on.
Destruction 0

Nine out of ten thematic strategies in the KID do not apply in the Pirc/Modern, and vice versa. Black having played the same 5 first moves in both (under different move order) does not constitute a "similarity" worth talking about.

Personnally, i don't know an equalizing line for black after 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nd4 4.Bc4...
This variation is supposed to be a problem for black.
Bryan Smith wrote a nice article about it :
https://www.chess.com/article/view/the-anti-sicilian-without-a-name