Playing sharp openings reduces tendency to blunder?

Sort:
Avatar of TeacherOfPain

@catmaster0

The reasons I see that blunders happen is because of a better or worse position.

Usually if someone is in a better position the chances for blundering in less unless the person is careless. However if a person is found in a worse position the chances for blundering is immediately increased. 

The way someone blunders is a matter of perspective, however there is no doubt that depending no the position depends on how many blunders can occur. 

It also depends on the mentality of a player, are they strong in their mentality such as nerves, genetics, comfortable with the position, are they under pressure? There are a lot of factors that contribute to a person blundering such as time and their ability. So this question is too broad, it is not a narrowed question down. If the question was asking something like: Do players blunder more under the time of 1:30 more? This is a reasonable question since it is narrower and gives a specific reasoning of what you are targeting for the blundering/mistakes of different players.

However when you put it in such a broad point of view, there i s no way to decipher which reason a person could blunder because it could be many, and some of them don't even have to be over the chess board, it could be mental, physical or even spiritual for all I know.

So with this said it is much a deeper understanding to consult, it is not like it is an closed ended question, the conversation can go either way. So I believe that blundering is dependent on the person and the position, but since there are so many factors, there is no way to tell truly how a person is affected, unless they explain their thoughts on the matter. 

Again I do believe that the position brings more of an effect on blundering and because of that other factors arise making an even bigger discussion. Henceforth there is no end all be all for this discussion as there is a deeper picture(as usually there is in a lot of things.)

I just wanted to implement my thoughts on the matter @catmaster0 I don't agree or disagree with your comment, this is just how I feel about why players blunder, and in my opinion I don't think it is hard to see why. I just think the pressure of a better or worse position makes either more or less. 

I know this is a little off topic but that's all I have to say about it. 

Avatar of TheNameofNames
TeacherOfPain wrote:

@catmaster0

The reasons I see that blunders happen is because of a better or worse position.

Usually if someone is in a better position the chances for blundering in less unless the person is careless. However if a person is found in a worse position the chances for blundering is immediately increased. 

The way someone blunders is a matter of perspective, however there is no doubt that depending no the position depends on how many blunders can occur. 

It also depends on the mentality of a player, are they strong in their mentality such as nerves, genetics, comfortable with the position, are they under pressure? There are a lot of factors that contribute to a person blundering such as time and their ability. So this question is too broad, it is not a narrowed question down. If the question was asking something like: Do players blunder more under the time of 1:30 more? This is a reasonable question since it is narrower and gives a specific reasoning of what you are targeting for the blundering/mistakes of different players.

However when you put it in such a broad point of view, there i s no way to decipher which reason a person could blunder because it could be many, and some of them don't even have to be over the chess board, it could be mental, physical or even spiritual for all I know.

So with this said it is much a deeper understanding to consult, it is not like it is an closed ended question, the conversation can go either way. So I believe that blundering is dependent on the person and the position, but since there are so many factors, there is no way to tell truly how a person is affected, unless they explain their thoughts on the matter. 

Again I do believe that the position brings more of an effect on blundering and because of that other factors arise making an even bigger discussion. Henceforth there is no end all be all for this discussion as there is a deeper picture(as usually there is in a lot of things.)

I just wanted to implement my thoughts on the matter @catmaster0 I don't agree or disagree with your comment, this is just how I feel about why players blunder, and in my opinion I don't think it is hard to see why. I just think the pressure of a better or worse position makes either more or less. 

I know this is a little off topic but that's all I have to say about it. 

it may be emotional when they make an objectively bad move that doesnt mean it was a good or bad move though lol you blunder you blunder technically and im no computer scientist but a lead should get gradually better. Obviously you can get tilted and make a bad move but there are games where no matter how many good moves you make you lose i dont know if any of those moves can be considered blunders but id imagine there will inevitably be blunders there its a very subtle idea but if you are not looking one more move ahead then you may commit to a plan where theres no backwards without wrecking you advantage, in other words you may notice 2 moves from the original commitment that youll lose a piece and now youve set the stage for failure because yes the alternate route may be not as bad but you had a hand in setting pieces in positions where theyll do things like blockade a retreating queen or something and so you have to sacrifice a pawn for example which is a blunder, there will always be some depth that you cant evaluate at