With all due respect to your rating, your hardware and DB, I don't think the dragon can be refuted.
If I was more familiar with it, I'd take you on :)
If you dont find an expert, I'd still give it a try, but I've never played it in my life. (I'll use stockfish)
Be a gent and leave it un-refuted. Allow us Dragon players our fun.
I love the dragon and have spent hours studying it, so while I might not be your level, I think I might be able to help in the opining (up to move 20 or so)
i think a cure for cancer will be found first
not if i can help it!
Be a gent and leave it un-refuted. Allow us Dragon players our fun.
sooner or later, you need to wake up to reality and play a real opening, like the najdorf. 
Because your a dragon player, you dont know the word reality. I'll be nice and define it for you. 
Reality:the world or the state of things as they actually exist, as opposed to an idealistic or notional idea of them.
Correct openings cannot be refuted.
Be a gent and leave it un-refuted. Allow us Dragon players our fun.
sooner or later, you need to wake up to reality and play a real opening, like the najdorf.
Because your a dragon player, you dont know the word reality. I'll be nice and define it for you.
Reality:the world or the state of things as they actually exist, as opposed to an idealistic or notional idea of them.
"Reality's a nice place but I wouldn't want to live there".
i think a cure for cancer will be found first
Already found
The Refuter strikes again!Did you refute the french and caro-kan yet?Please tell us some more about the greatness of Najdorf(The Opening).
Sac, sac, mate. Everyone knows that refutation.
I've done it!!! I've finally refuted the Sodium attack!
I've done it!!! I've finally refuted the Sodium attack!
wtf is the sodium attack?
I like it better as the knightmare.
The Dragon is not refuted!
+1
Or else why would Garry Kasparov and other famous chess players still use it? If Anand loses to it, then it's not refuted.
Does Kasparov still use it? In what, coffeehouse games?
Or else why would Garry Kasparov and other famous chess players still use it? If Anand loses to it, then it's not refuted.
Does Kasparov still use it? In what, coffeehouse games?
Well, Kasparov quit professional chess in 2005, so he's probably out of pracice, and, he used it against Anand in a match.
More precisely, the 1995 WC match, with which he scored an impressive +2 =2 -0. This is what made people stop believing the opening was refuted.
Not sure about modern theory, but surely anyone who kept Fischer's "refutation" of sac-sac-mate is going to be blown up by someone who is bookep up.
There is no sac-sac-mate - Fischer himself played the Dragon, Najdorf and Dragondorf. He is basically contradicting himself.
The Bg7 in the Dragon is a great defender of the king, it covers key squares like h6 and h8. The opening is definitely not refuted.
Did the Dragondorf even exist when Fischer was active?
i am looking for a fellow chess.com player to help me refute the dragon once and for all. I have houndi 3.0 with 26 cores and 32gb ram and a data base with over 4,000,000 games. Any one down?