the ruy and the italian is totally different main difference is black isn't allowed the d5 push in the ruy but can accomplish it quite easily in the italian.
in the italian the initiative is lost and the game is boring with slow play.
in the ruy white keeps the initiative but has to play strategically the best move to do so which is why the top players hardly ever play the italian if they do they play the evans or the 2 knights game
i too had the same problem i got bugged of 2. ... e5 and now i'm bugged of 2.c5 so i tried every main opening and their sidelines but now i'm fine to play the 2. ... e5 im not scared of italian as equality is easy and the evans is sumthing i don't have too much exp in.
i don't know about the scotch
The Ruy Lopez was one of the first openings I learned and I have always played it as white after 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6, but I need a change. I have grown to like it less and less; I would now prefer see the Sicilian defense rather than the Morphy defense, and so I am looking for a new response to ...e5. I was wondering if the Italian game is that much different from the Ruy, or if the positions end up being mostly similar. I was also intersted in what people thought about the Scotch Game. I know GM Dzindzichashvili recommends it in his vidoes, but I am a little worried by the percentages in Games Explorer, which has White winning 36% and black winning 31% of the time after 3...exd4, compared to the statistically stronger Ruy. I am also a little wary of gambits since I am stronger at wining games by gaining a material advantage and trading into a winning endgame compared to checkmating an opponent with aggresive offensive tactics. Is the Scotch gambit a true gambit, or is it more like the Queens Gambit where white is assured to win back his lost pawn?