There are no abnormal statistical results so far.
Sicilian: main lines, pawn structures and statistical results

Have you ever came across, 1.e4 c5, 2.Nf3 black moves and white moves 3.Bd3
Not in my personal games but there are few dozens of master games in the local database. I see that ChessOK database gives the evaluation +0.00 to it both in Old and Modern Sicilian. More generally, moves Bd3 and Bd6 in openings blocking pawns, look awkward but they have quite decent engine evaluations. I played several times Bd6 (while blocking the pawn on d7) as black in King's Pawn games with mixed results.

Isnt that a system invented by an american player? I forgot his name, but I have played it, not horribly bad, not extremely good, the idea is to hide the bishop ruy lopez style with c3-Bc2-d4.

You are very correct Bronstein, this move is for white's game more so, and it give lots of flexiblity for the white bishop once on c2 and the cp is on c3

Najdorf
------
Polugaevsky: +0.24 sh1=1.46 sh2=1.17
Poisoned Pawn: +0.13 sh1=0.92 sh2=0.81
Main Line: +0.28 sh1=1.74 sh2=1.07
English Attack: +0.32 sh1=1.1 sh2=0.83
Thanks, Bernard! It happens deeper in Sicilian since Najdorf starts at 10 plies. Polugaevsky variation is double-edged. At how many plies have U evaluated the main line ?
I indicate PSCC, number of master games (K=1000), statistical evaluations and the sharpness in some peculiar cases.
2 plies
3 plies, 10K+ games
4 plies, 10K+ games
5 plies, 10K+ games
(to be continued)