slav doesn't work against London
KID (King's Indian Defense).
Doesn't a "perpetual repertoire" get a bit ... same-ish... after a while?
I play either Kings Indian or Nf6-c5-Qb6 setup, saw it from Agadmators video and at my level the opponents crumble pretty fast from agression.
KID (King's Indian Defense).
Doesn't a "perpetual repertoire" get a bit ... same-ish... after a while?
Nope, I find myself best at narrow schemes but I am looking for answer such: "Slav vs. London exist". I want to listen just how. I am refusing adding anything else, I just want to know the branch of Slav to concure with. Maybe Semi-Slav but what line?!
Yes, in someone else optics that what I am playing is under-esteem level. I don't mind - I must get by in front of a chessboard.
I might create a youtube video on this topic soon! ![]()
Here's how you deal with the London via the Slav. For d4/d5 I used to play this, where a London isn't very good at all:
Then against the accelerated I'd play something like:
Even though this was more fun, I realized I was giving the London player more than they deserved. The kingside is shakey in the accelerated line. The Krause is a sharp line that really pairs with the Austrian attack, not the Slav.
Begrudgingly I switched back to this line. While it is a good line, it is the most common response to the London. Very overplayed which I don't like. But black is scoring well and it's the really best option-
You can transpose to the same line via the accelerated.
For avoiding boredom / pressuring the player / scoring well, that's honestly the best solution available via d4/d5.
Eventually I switched to the English Defense, which is reached via the Horwitz move order. That completely solved London problem. You get an immediate attack that's more powerful than the other one, and not as common -
And for the standard london, it either just flat out fails immediately -