Talk to me about the Sicilian.

... Where are your own thoughts and opinions?

@kindaspongey -

Continue to post in the forums as you have been. You have just as much right to post content as any other chess.com subscriber. It’s called freedom of expression. The overwhelming majority of the forum readership benefits from the information you provide especially as the content you post are mostly quotes reflecting the perspective of those who are more expert at chess than those who try to silence you. Whether it can be construed as controversial is immaterial.  The forum bullies can’t be allowed to control and censor forum content and shout down contributors simply because their mean-spirited and immature sensibilities are disturbed.

In my posts when I think that I have something worth sharing.

... He states his objective at the beginning of the book is to help an amateur develop an opening repertoire involving openings that are not highly theoretical, and then recommends the Dragon (which is highly theoretical!) ...

... If I remember correctly, he also recommends the Alekhine Defense, which has lines that are also very theoretical (specifically the 4 Pawns Attack).  In short, his recommendations do not coincide with his stated goal (and frankly, recommending the Alekhine for class players is skeptical, at best). ...

... Instead of putting together a basic repertoire, he gives an opening, and then next chapter will be "If you don't like what we did then, how about this instead ...", ...

... If someone really wants a book to help with their openings, John Watson's "Mastering the Chess Opening" series is far superior to Tamburro's book.  Watson does not try to give an opening repertoire ..., but rather goes over common concepts, themes, strategies, and tactics of many common openings.

And you think that because he admits his recommendation is flawed it is somehow justified?

"Here, we know that 2+2=4, but for now we are going to assume 2+2=6 for right now and you won't have to worry about it actually being 4 until much later ..." ...

I've been a Chess novice for 32 years. Only in the last year and a half have I been seriously playing the Sicilian. Tell me some stuff about it. Others might find it useful as well. What are its dynamics? How do you win with it? Whats its mood? What are its pitfalls, its weapons? But talk to me about it. It would be great to just read some stuff and some thoughts, help me get a shape of what the deal is.

... I prefer to be called bully than  mindlessly "eating" everything  publishers try to feed me. ...

Nothing against the Najdorf (it is my preferred defense as black), but I would suggest that you might see faster improvement by spending less time worrying about openings and more time working on other aspects of the game (specifically, tactics, opening principles, and endgames).

Then stop recommending books that do more harm than good.