It is Qd2 and Carlsen...
New idea, using typical development (Qd2-b3-Bb2).
Easy to play as white, and of course, works only against 2...d6.
It is a way to "improve" on Chekhover line (with Nf3 and d4, here it is Nc3 and d4).
It is Qd2 and Carlsen...
New idea, using typical development (Qd2-b3-Bb2).
Easy to play as white, and of course, works only against 2...d6.
It is a way to "improve" on Chekhover line (with Nf3 and d4, here it is Nc3 and d4).
It is Qd2 and Carlsen...
New idea, using typical development (Qd2-b3-Bb2).
Easy to play as white, and of course, works only against 2...d6.
It is a way to "improve" on Chekhover line (with Nf3 and d4, here it is Nc3 and d4).
YIkes -- thanks for both corrections. (I hadn't had my morning coffee yet!)
(1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Qxd4 Nc6 5.Qd2)
I'm sure the book answer the obvious question that a novice like me would ask: that seems kinda odd to move your queen twice in the first five moves . . .
In any event, thanks for the reply!
With how much Carlsen has mentioned that he dislikes opening prep, I wouldn't be surprised if he played this opening on a whim, without any prep at all.
With how much Carlsen has mentioned that he dislikes opening prep, I wouldn't be surprised if he played this opening on a whim, without any prep at all.
Which sort of goes along with the theory that if you're good enough, you can play almost anything and win? ;-)
While web surfing for books on the Sicilian (looking for a intro book with theory, not a repertoire book) I stumbled on this:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/8793812442/ - The Carlson Variation -- a new Anti-Sicilian (5. Qe2)
I'd never heard of this (or ever heard of 5. Qe2). Thoughts?
I’ve played it occasionally, I’ve mostly lost, but it’s always fun. Usually I don’t look for tactics on the e4 pawn too hard and just lose material.
St. Louis Chess Club did a video on this opening the other day: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8bWNknC6ro
St. Louis Chess Club did a video on this opening the other day: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8bWNknC6ro
How fortuitous! Thanks for catching that and bringing it to our attention!
With how much Carlsen has mentioned that he dislikes opening prep, I wouldn't be surprised if he played this opening on a whim, without any prep at all.
Which sort of goes along with the theory that if you're good enough, you can play almost anything and win? ;-)
True.
Carlsen could play 1.Nf3 ... 2.Ng1 ... 3.e3 ... and still beat most Grandmasters.
But that's because he's Carlsen. I wouldn't recommend that for the rest of us.
While web surfing for books on the Sicilian (looking for a intro book with theory, not a repertoire book) I stumbled on this:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/8793812442/ - The Carlson Variation -- a new Anti-Sicilian (5. Qe2)
I'd never heard of this (or ever heard of 5. Qe2). Thoughts?