...
The f5 Opening

I played this opening in a 24 hour per move time control:
http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=81825792

I like 1.a3 too sometimes, especially if I have too many white games since 1.c3,c5 or 1.c3,d5 and 1...e5 2.c4 isn't forced. That leaves 1.a3 usually transposing into many Sicilians up a tempo, but black's setup is good because it's designed to slowly phase out white's initiative and take it himself. White on the first move already has the initiative.
1.Nf3 2.b3 3.Bb2 4.e3 is a great system usually but sometimes black can disrupt this system.
1.e4,f5? is the herpaderp gambit, for those times you must lose.

Why so many people tossing around new names for the Fred?
Playing an even worse move than standard Fred theory on move two doesn't make it some other opening altogether. It just makes it an even worse Fred.

Why so many people tossing around new names for the Fred?
Playing an even worse move than standard Fred theory on move two doesn't make it some other opening altogether. It just makes it an even worse Fred.
My opening is not the Fred, The Fred/Phred has different lines. It's like saying that the French is the same as Najdorf or something
Of course this opening is just losing, but presumably the lesser evil if you wanted to play it in very fast time controls would be 2...Nf6 and 3...d5, where black may only be a pawn down for nothing against routine play. A couple of 2300s have even tried to play this way in opens, though with deservedly bad results.
I call this the Bavarian or the Bavarian Castle: