I managed to play it in a bullet game.
The ICBM Gambit

#20 is the average tennison player summarised
absolute hope chess maximised
who plays be6, its awkward and leads to tripled isolated pawns on the e file after nxe6
and then you dont take it
sorry, you dont create variations on openings in which black makes blunders
this is like giving a name to e4 e5 nf3 nc6 ba6

the problem is, Nc6 counters the whole thing and then black is winning even if we wouldnt gambit the knight and bishop
I have a game I had just finished that makes use of the ICBM Gambit, although it doesn't start with the usual opening moves.
Doesn't that last move hang a queen?
Technically, it does. But after 29. ... Nxd5, I can just take both rooks, albeit sacrificing one of my rooks on top of the queen. Also I didn't want to draw the game by repetition.
tl;dr: 29. Qxd5+ is technically a blunder, but Black is left having to fight a Rook vs. Knight Endgame, and I didn't feel like drawing the game.
I like Ne5
here is my contribution - queen trap for black if you carelessly follow the gotham video with Qxc7.