also i just saw someone else with this exact same post
what do you play after 1.d4
Why should you play what I play? My lines are based on aiming for positions that I like to play--figure out what you like to play and aim for those structures in your openings. (as for what I play after d4, in blitz games I'll try lots of stuff: g6, d5 and Tartakower QGD, d4 and Tarrasch & semi-Tarrasch, d4 with e6 and c6 and then f5 if I get the chance [stonewall dutch by transposition]. These are mostly defenses where I get free piece play in return for a long term weakness. Many strong players got high ratings by studiously avoiding positions with long term weaknesses, s figure out what you want for the middlegame and aim for that.
--Just my opinion, Bill

Play the Modern - Pterodactyl. 1...g6 2...c5 and take on d4 when you can. Nf6 and d6 releases the LSB to g4. Middlegames get very tactical if you focus on bringing the knights up. For example Ng4 instead of Bg4.

QGD, Tarrasch Defence.
A dynamic approach, with plenty of tactics. Also good for 1.c4, and 1.Nf3.
At your level though, the best "line" is not hanging pieces.
QGD Tarrasch Defense is a problem for Black now-a-days. You need almost perfect play to survive after 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 c5 4.cxd5 exd5 5.Nf3 Nc6 6.dxc5!! - After the old 6.g3, Black is fine.

I used to play 1. d4 followed by 2. e3 and then play a Stonewall Attack. I had a lot of success with it at first, as my rating went up, I found it to be less effective against higher rated players. I still play it occasionally in blitz because I know the set up and can play the first 7-10 moves quickly against most moves by black.

QGD, Tarrasch Defence.
A dynamic approach, with plenty of tactics. Also good for 1.c4, and 1.Nf3.
At your level though, the best "line" is not hanging pieces.
not all 700s hang pieces
i just need help with middle game plans and ideas
QGD, Tarrasch Defence.
not all 700s hang pieces
i just need help with middle game plans and ideas
Bezgodov has a book on the Tarrasch with more than 300 annotated games. If you play thru all 300 you will start to pick up pieces and drop them on the right place without thinking.
The line Thrillerfan refers to ['delayed early capture'] is popular for white players who are good at end games, want a draw and maybe a win if black messes up. It is testing so you'd need to setup the position and play vs computers of increasing strength until you feel you can hold a draw vs somewhat stronger players. Black needs to readjust thinking to being patient.
-Bill

QGD, Tarrasch Defence.
I found one game of yours against Tsarouhas where you played the Schara Gambit. I've heard from Shankland that it's not so good for short time controls due to needing time to calculate a good defense. Do you recommend it or should we go for the pure Tarrasch instead?
QGD, Tarrasch Defence.
I found one game of yours against Tsarouhas where you played the Schara Gambit. I've heard from Shankland that it's not so good for short time controls due to needing time to calculate a good defense. Do you recommend it or should we go for the pure Tarrasch instead?
I'm interested in what pfren responds.
I'm old and slow and lower rated but I've been experimenting with it in blitz at the club. There isnt that much theory to it so why not watch a video and start playing it? So far, I've won every game as black vs USCF A players and in every game when I reconstruct positions and analyze by computer I find lots of tactics missed. (My theory is that the tactics in it are not thematic in my other openings so my 'antenna' isnt tuned for them.) I'd want to start picking up more of the tactics before playing it in a real , slow time control rated, game.
so try it and see if you have fun
-Bill
My game with Kostas (Tsarouhas) from that open in Cyprus last year is dreadful:
Black got a very comfortable equality around move 13, and then he (...which is read as "I") played all sort of nonsense to get a totally hopeless pawn-down ending, which somehow white failed to convert.
And of course the Schara cannot be a repertoire opening: it is applicable only against 3.Nc3.
Can you comment on the line with Na6-c5 that I see most playing today vs the older line with Nc6, Bc5 Qe7 OOO and g5 ??
Thanks--- Bill

Thank you!
(I am also glad to see that a 2600 can err in a 4 rook endgame.)
A 2600 chess player is not a perfectionist. Neither is a 2800 player. They just don't do really stupid stuff like hang material or ignore pawn structure. They still make mistakes though. LeBron James misses at the free throw line, doesn't he? Tom Brady throws an interception, doesn't he? Max Scherzer walks a batter, doesn't he? You just don't see the ridiculous mistakes that 1500 players make.
I need some good lines to study as black after d4, maybe 1 or 2 simple lines