your excuse being ¨i knew more theory and somehow my whole typically playstyle changed agianst you + im better¨
What is the hardest opening for average players?
Sort:
Aug 17, 2023
0
#144
AngryPuffer написал:
your excuse being ¨i knew more theory and somehow my whole typically playstyle changed agianst you + im better¨
Im more of a aggresive-positional player, Somewhere in the middle.
Aug 17, 2023
0
#145
Maybe aggresive and positional doesnt fit together in your vision, Then why do moves that are aggresive and also positionally benefit the side exist?
Aug 17, 2023
0
#146
illegalthingy написал:
Can we turn this back to what’s the hardest opening
Srry if I end the world
Srry if I end the world
I want bragging rights
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:
AngryPuffer написал:
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:
AngryPuffer написал:
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:
AngryPuffer написал:
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:
AngryPuffer написал:
one of the comments you made to me ¨idk how to play this sicilian lol¨
then. just 6 moves later you suddenly know all the theory and play at computer accuracy
the team already figured out you were cheating. chess.com does not care about cheating so they will allow it to continuee
i allready proved myself correct. continue to comment whatever to make yourself feel better.
ok ngl i tried to prove my point but you are quite stubborn.
your idea: ¨you are mad because i won and my high accuracy is because im better and know more theory¨
what it actually sounds like : ¨i know i cheated but they cant prove it so imma harass you and make excuses to my high accuracy and sudden knowledge of how to play openings that i had not had 10 seconds ago¨
i didnt know more theory in that variation soo im just better ngl.
you followed the computer the whole game, every so often making your own computer-approved move that is the 3rd best instead of the 1st
Isn't that called a excuse?
exactly
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/85815654627?tab=reviewThis game you 2 times inserted your own little innacuracy in order to not be too sus
my moves were human and are understandable, yours were not
+ i know ideas in the catalan
Aug 17, 2023
0
#149
AngryPuffer написал:
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:
AngryPuffer написал:
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:
AngryPuffer написал:
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:
AngryPuffer написал:
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:
AngryPuffer написал:
one of the comments you made to me ¨idk how to play this sicilian lol¨
then. just 6 moves later you suddenly know all the theory and play at computer accuracy
the team already figured out you were cheating. chess.com does not care about cheating so they will allow it to continuee
i allready proved myself correct. continue to comment whatever to make yourself feel better.
ok ngl i tried to prove my point but you are quite stubborn.
your idea: ¨you are mad because i won and my high accuracy is because im better and know more theory¨
what it actually sounds like : ¨i know i cheated but they cant prove it so imma harass you and make excuses to my high accuracy and sudden knowledge of how to play openings that i had not had 10 seconds ago¨
i didnt know more theory in that variation soo im just better ngl.
you followed the computer the whole game, every so often making your own computer-approved move that is the 3rd best instead of the 1st
Isn't that called a excuse?
exactly
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/85815654627?tab=reviewThis game you 2 times inserted your own little innacuracy in order to not be too sus
my moves were human and are understandable, yours were not
Dam soo you can't understand Nd2 allowing me to play f4?
Aug 17, 2023
0
#151
Dam soo you cant understand b3 allowing me to divert the rook to the kingside without worrying about the a4 pawn?
Aug 17, 2023
0
#152
Dam soo you can't understand the development of a rook with Re1?
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:
Maybe aggresive and positional doesnt fit together in your vision, Then why do moves that are aggresive and also positionally benefit the side exist?
you are a fully agressive patzer who does not know much on openings.
then suddenly agianst me you are a positional god + somehow knows all the theory + playing like a computer
Aug 17, 2023
0
#154
AngryPuffer написал:
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:
Maybe aggresive and positional doesnt fit together in your vision, Then why do moves that are aggresive and also positionally benefit the side exist?
you are a fully agressive patzer who does not know much on openings.
then suddenly agianst me you are a positional god + somehow knows all the theory + playing like a computer
Bro what positional stuff? I only prevented b5 is that really called "Positional god" And not just "Preventing counterplay"?
Aug 17, 2023
0
#155
Badchesserrr4486999 написал:
AngryPuffer написал:
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:
Maybe aggresive and positional doesnt fit together in your vision, Then why do moves that are aggresive and also positionally benefit the side exist?
you are a fully agressive patzer who does not know much on openings.
then suddenly agianst me you are a positional god + somehow knows all the theory + playing like a computer
Bro what positional stuff? I only prevented b5 is that really called "Positional god" And not just "Preventing counterplay"?
Also ngl you probably dont know what the ruy lopez is and how to play it but i do soo i know more theory than you.
Y’all we still on this game?
Puffer you lost. It’s fine. It’s one game. I took just as big of an L against you in that French back in the day just let it go. It rly doesn’t matter in the slightest.
Badrrr you’re lowkey somehow MORE of a sore winner than Puffer is a sore loser. You played nonsense, got lucky, and won a piece before Puffer resigned. Odds were you’d have had a hard time converting that winning endgame in blitz.
And again. It’s ONE GAME! If y’all wanna fight, take it outside and play a First to Ten match. Leave it out of the forums.
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:
AngryPuffer написал:
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:
Maybe aggresive and positional doesnt fit together in your vision, Then why do moves that are aggresive and also positionally benefit the side exist?
you are a fully agressive patzer who does not know much on openings.
then suddenly agianst me you are a positional god + somehow knows all the theory + playing like a computer
Bro what positional stuff? I only prevented b5 is that really called "Positional god" And not just "Preventing counterplay"?
you still played most of the top moves
+ you have never played the Qxd4 line ever and you typically play the open. suddenly you know how to play it and how it works? yeah no.
Aug 17, 2023
0
#158
AngryPuffer написал:
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:
AngryPuffer написал:
Badchesserrr4486999 wrote:
Maybe aggresive and positional doesnt fit together in your vision, Then why do moves that are aggresive and also positionally benefit the side exist?
you are a fully agressive patzer who does not know much on openings.
then suddenly agianst me you are a positional god + somehow knows all the theory + playing like a computer
Bro what positional stuff? I only prevented b5 is that really called "Positional god" And not just "Preventing counterplay"?
you still played most of the top moves
+ you have never played the Qxd4 line ever and you typically play the open. suddenly you know how to play it and how it works? yeah no.
..........................
I picked it up after i witnessed hikaru playing it. though i didnt get to the lines i saw hikaru play soo i just played like i did in the game.
one of the comments you made to me ¨idk how to play this sicilian lol¨
then. just 6 moves later you suddenly know all the theory and play at computer accuracy
the team already figured out you were cheating. chess.com does not care about cheating so they will allow it to continuee
i allready proved myself correct. continue to comment whatever to make yourself feel better.
ok ngl i tried to prove my point but you are quite stubborn.
your idea: ¨you are mad because i won and my high accuracy is because im better and know more theory¨
what it actually sounds like : ¨i know i cheated but they cant prove it so imma harass you and make excuses to my high accuracy and sudden knowledge of how to play openings that i had not had 10 seconds ago¨
i didnt know more theory in that variation soo im just better ngl.
you followed the computer the whole game, every so often making your own computer-approved move that is the 3rd best instead of the 1st
Isn't that called a excuse?
exactly
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/85815654627?tab=reviewThis game you 2 times inserted your own little innacuracy in order to not be too sus