what should i play vs the sicilian (now a discussion of whites side of the sicilian)

Sort:
Ilampozhil25

whats the magnus sicilian??

wait, since when were openings named after modern masters!?

im searching and it seems like its just a sveshnikov where white doesnt play ndb5

SamuelAjedrez95

See #56

I didn't know it had a name but I heard some people calling it the Magnus Sicilian.

It's basically 1. e4 c5 2. Nc3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Qxd4 Nc6 5. Qd2, and white wants to play b3-Bb2-0-0-0.

Ilampozhil25

yeah many modern variations (not to be confused with 1... g6 lol) w/o official names get these unofficial ones

like e.g. 1. e4 b5 is the "polish counter gambit" as some people call it

that looks like a chekhover with Nc3, combined with fianchetto ideas and stuff straight out of the center game 

it also looks like many sicilians but white is just down a tempo (that depends on what the g1 knight is doing though)

SamuelAjedrez95
Ilampozhil25 wrote:

wait, since when were openings named after modern masters!?

It's rare but some people take to naming some variations after some modern masters. There is the Dubov Tarrasch, after GM Daniil Dubov. 7. ...cxd4 8. Nxd4 Bc5.

SamuelAjedrez95
Ilampozhil25 wrote:

like e.g. 1. e4 b5 is the "polish counter gambit" as some people call it 

Makes sense. It's basically a polish defence against e4. I'm not sure if it's worthy of a name though 😂

Ilampozhil25

...

half of that post is irrelevant nonsense

of the other half, half of that is as if i play sicilian as black

and the remaining quarter is "the ideas always remain"

obviously the ideas remain, why else are they considered as normal ideas?

SamuelAjedrez95

It looks like she just dislike bombed me.✌️😓

SamuelAjedrez95
DancingQueen2006 wrote:

please dont critizise on your pedestal w/o anything nice or useful insight please

We all appreciate Dancing Queen's useful insight.

Ilampozhil25
DancingQueen2006 wrote:

hey hey hey are you interested in candy bars im selling them for girls scouts of America!

this is not even related to chess

yea okay so do you like anti sicilians?

used to, maybe not so much

the grandprix is my favorite and easy to learn.

ok

I learned it from a book jk type grand prix gm roman dzizhashvilli.

ok

You can forgo the last name and the whole thing is idea based there are very few lines you need to actually remember.

the same is true of the line samuel gave me?

The video covers the basics not the d4 sacs or anything.

there are d4 sacs in the grand prix!?

also what video

It's domination of the dark squares and good for someone at your level and no matter what white does the ideas and concepts remain.

aah yes this is the thing

in any opening, good moves keep the main ideas

otherwise, why are they the main ideas?

as for the open the accelerated is easy

for whom!?

if youre talking about black... go to some other thread this one is from whites pov

bc its not the almighty sicilian dragon Yugoslav w/e and playing the open sicilian atr a lower level youll see alot of bc4

black plays bc4? how is that even possible

and if youre talking about white playing bc4, doesnt that mean you are talking about me playing sicilian as black?

i dont btw and dont plan to

anyway that the thing about learning mainlines as a beginner. You NEVER SEE THEM

yes

very true and annoying

but then what should i learn?

nothing at all and then get crushed by the person who knows theory?

4...Ne5 as black in the scotch!?

unless it like the first 5 moves of the Italian or spanish then as white you get e4 and dont know what to do

ok

so a) as white you dont "get" e4

you "give" it, i guess

also; yeah people usually divert after 4 moves

but the mainlines are also just more common

so lets say 40% of people know a mainline

these people will play one of a few lines

then the 60% have much more options (coz theyre just doing something random) and so the mainlines are, each of them, more common

anyway im veering on the rumble strip my point stands I wear on my unborn babys baby daddy hold this help. BYE!

this last bit is also off topic

here i provided some insight on your entire comment

SamuelAjedrez95

Thank you for your kindness, my queen. Your likes are greatly appreciated.

Ilampozhil25
DancingQueen2006 wrote:

thanks anything useful you can provide?

hmm

im kind of meant to be getting stuff here, i am the one who started this thread to ask a question

other then semantic argument

actually what did i say which was semantic

and criticism of "nonsense" that you dont specify or refute

true then, but i did this now

bc well... if not then please dont critizise on your pedestal

what pedestal!?

w/o anything nice or useful insight please

Ilampozhil25

#70 sharing your opinion about open sicilian from blacks pov, mostly

and.. thats not what this thread is about

im fine if you discuss general sicilian stuff, but do it from whites pov

the discussion between the najdorf and sveshnikov can be done elsewhere, here its for discussion between the say rauzer and sozin

#71 what in my profile made you realise what

TheSampson
SamuelAjedrez95 wrote:
mrOpenRuy wrote:

samuel, do you think that white gets any real play in the grand prix if black knows what hes doing?

No. If black knows what he's doing then of course 0 chance.

I'm 900, so you probably won't relate to my experiences, but I've had a great time playing the Grand Prix. I crushed every Sicilian player I've ever seen, because they don't actually know what they're doing. Once my rating gets higher, though, I might start to experience what you guys are feeling.

TheSampson
SamuelAjedrez95 wrote:
TheSampson wrote:

Just look at this bullet game played by Magnus Carlsen (as shown in GothamChess's Grand Prix Attack video)

  1. It's a bullet game.
  2. Played by Magnus Carlsen.
  3. Gothamchess 🤢

cRiNgE frustratedfrustratedfrustrated....tear

Ilampozhil25

#81 has a logical contradiction

we dont see sicilian players at all at this levelmeh

Ilampozhil25

the post quoted in #82 is very funny

it takes all of what the post it quotes says

puts it in a list form and puts a puke emoji

meaning completely changes

and yeah all those points make sense

levy has lost entertainment value and education value

2020- early 21 were the peak months

now they arent even funny and the only thing i know from there is "the rooooook" memes which are just dumb

TheSampson
Ilampozhil25 wrote:

#81 has a logical contradiction

we dont see sicilian players at all at this level

I see them every once in a while. It's not a logical contradiction to say you've never seen a Sicilian player, so I haven't.

Ilampozhil25

oh nice

you dont know how to judge tone

that was kinda tongue in cheek

but still saying that an opening is good (implying it is better than everything else) because of surprise value.... i mean why play an opening if you only want to win quick

thats just seeking instant gratification, and missing out on the entire fun ie the struggle of long games (move count wise)

SamuelAjedrez95
TheSampson wrote:

I'm 900, so you probably won't relate to my experiences, but I've had a great time playing the Grand Prix. I crushed every Sicilian player I've ever seen, because they don't actually know what they're doing. Once my rating gets higher, though, I might start to experience what you guys are feeling.

This is the point though. The strategy is dependent upon the opponent's ignorance.

I prefer to play in a way which is fun but also viable against good players. The Grand Prix Attack may be viable at our level but it starts to lose steam once the competition improves.

The Open Sicilian will always be viable and also it's more fun. If opponents don't know what they're doing against the GPA, then they aren't going to do any better against the Open Sicilian, which is far more dangerous.

TheSampson
Ilampozhil25 wrote:

oh nice

you dont know how to judge tone

that was kinda tongue in cheek

but still saying that an opening is good (implying it is better than everything else) because of surprise value.... i mean why play an opening if you only want to win quick

thats just seeking instant gratification, and missing out on the entire fun ie the struggle of long games (move count wise)

When did I say it's better than everything else? I said it's a suitable option to play against the Sicilian. The Open Sicilian's better, of course, but I just think the theory is too extensive. The fun and struggle of long games in the Sicilian can only be achieved by the mainlines- which, you know, have enough theory packed in them to feed a whale. If you think the Grand Prix's a bad opening, that's great. I'm not trying to argue that your opinion is invalid.