What's the best openings for bullet?

Sort:
Avatar of BlackmoonTheDragon

I'm a new bullet player and I want to try a few new good openings... what are your suggestions?

Avatar of CDRED141

Qeanes gamblit. 

Avatar of Lion_Rider780
CDRED141 wrote:

Qeanes gamblit. 

Oof

Avatar of Lion_Rider780
BlackmoonTheDragon wrote:

I'm a new bullet player and I want to try a few new good openings... what are your suggestions?

My bullet rating is hardly worth mentioning but I say bowlder attack

Avatar of CDRED141
Boba-Fett87 wrote:
CDRED141 wrote:

Qeanes gamblit. 

Oof

What? 

Avatar of Lion_Rider780
CDRED141 wrote:
Boba-Fett87 wrote:
CDRED141 wrote:

Qeanes gamblit. 

Oof

What? 

Nvm

Avatar of CDRED141
Boba-Fett87 wrote:
CDRED141 wrote:
Boba-Fett87 wrote:
CDRED141 wrote:

Qeanes gamblit. 

Oof

What? 

Nvm

👁️👁️

Avatar of Peet_The_Sock_Man

fools checkmate lol

Avatar of Peet_The_Sock_Man

or pawns go brrr

Avatar of InfiniteBlunders

um i mean honestly just whatever, probably d4 (like a queen's gambit) or e4 (like an italian)

Avatar of Dabs2

Just play fast nothing else matters but don't just hang a piece every move. That's what it is below 2000

Avatar of Ethan_Brollier
Boba-Fett87 wrote:
BlackmoonTheDragon wrote:

I'm a new bullet player and I want to try a few new good openings... what are your suggestions?

My bullet rating is hardly worth mentioning but I say bowlder attack

Bowdler Attack in bullet? Against the Sicilian try for the Delayed Alapin. You'll win a lot or play a better Open Sicilian

Avatar of Ethan_Brollier
Squid wrote:

openings dont really matter in bullet

Opening theory definitely doesn't but premoving does, so what you have to do is play openings that do well against normal variations, think Englund Gambit, Danish Gambit etc. They aren't the best openings around but your opponent is either losing material or time, either of which is deadly in bullet.

Avatar of Ethan_Brollier
Squid wrote:

yes I think I know that based of my rating...

Ahhh, my bad, Mr. FIDE 3000

Avatar of InfiniteBlunders
Ethan_Brollier wrote:
Squid wrote:

openings dont really matter in bullet

Opening theory definitely doesn't but premoving does, so what you have to do is play openings that do well against normal variations, think Englund Gambit, Danish Gambit etc. They aren't the best openings around but your opponent is either losing material or time, either of which is deadly in bullet.

Danish yes, Englund no

they don’t need to be OP enough to be played consistently at top level, but they shouldn’t be losing right away (like for example the Englund)

Avatar of Ethan_Brollier
f3_Kf2_1-0 wrote:
Ethan_Brollier wrote:
Squid wrote:

openings dont really matter in bullet

Opening theory definitely doesn't but premoving does, so what you have to do is play openings that do well against normal variations, think Englund Gambit, Danish Gambit etc. They aren't the best openings around but your opponent is either losing material or time, either of which is deadly in bullet.

Danish yes, Englund no

they don’t need to be OP enough to be played consistently at top level, but they shouldn’t be losing right away (like for example the Englund)

It's not losing right away, the line that's fully losing is the Qxb2 line, but the Hartlaub-Charlick, Soller, Zilbermints Gambits all range from +1.1 to +1.3, with the Deferred Soller Gambit coming in at +1.7 if you decline it, but +1.3 if you don't. These aren't good by any stretch of the imagination, but none of them are immediately losing, and of course, online someone might just premove and the Englund Gambit Declined is pretty good for Black all things considered.

Avatar of InfiniteBlunders
Ethan_Brollier wrote:
f3_Kf2_1-0 wrote:
Ethan_Brollier wrote:
Squid wrote:

openings dont really matter in bullet

Opening theory definitely doesn't but premoving does, so what you have to do is play openings that do well against normal variations, think Englund Gambit, Danish Gambit etc. They aren't the best openings around but your opponent is either losing material or time, either of which is deadly in bullet.

Danish yes, Englund no

they don’t need to be OP enough to be played consistently at top level, but they shouldn’t be losing right away (like for example the Englund)

It's not losing right away, the line that's fully losing is the Qxb2 line, but the Hartlaub-Charlick, Soller, Zilbermints Gambits all range from +1.1 to +1.3, with the Deferred Soller Gambit coming in at +1.7 if you decline it, but +1.3 if you don't. These aren't good by any stretch of the imagination, but none of them are immediately losing, and of course, online someone might just premove and the Englund Gambit Declined is pretty good for Black all things considered.

So almost losing (as long as White plays the obvious dxe5)

though ofc ig there are different ideas of losing at different levels

Avatar of terribletamarin

Bullet makes it easier to get away with dubious openings, however, this does not mean that they are objectively good choices.

I know on lower levels people play slower on average in bullet, so the flagging value of an opening is more important. But typically, the best you can do is playing an opening that you are familiar with.

When you play a system that's easy to premove like the KIA, your opponent will also have some easy moves.

Avatar of novelty3477

study first 1 opening.. i watch NM Robert Ramirez played online Pirc Defense as both color.. because he know very well the theory..

Avatar of Poweranony
I would say the valencia opening for bullet (1. d3 e5 2. Nd2)