Which variation of the QGD would you recommend for a weak player?

Sort:
A-mateur

Hello, 

I decided to stop playing the Dutch defense, which was my favorite and only defense against 1.d4 since I started to play chess, because it was not reliable enough for me. Instead I played the Nizmo-Indian (and the QID) but I didn't like it and didn't have great results with it.

I would like to play the QGD, as it seems to be a very sound opening, and is recommended by many experienced players to beginners as far as I could read in chess.com.

I read a lot of threads about why beginners should play the Tarrasch, but I don't like IQP structures, and I'm looking for a solid defense, not a risky one (even if undoubtedly the Tarrasch does provide attacking possibilities).

 

What variation of the QGD would you recommend me? The Lasker? The Orthodox? The Cambridge Springs?

 

 

Also, I know that the Tartakower often gives black hanging pawns, and I would like a sound pawn structure.

 

Thanks for your suggestions. 

Stil1

I recommend the Orthodox.

It's one of my favorite defenses.

To avoid IQPs and such, you can develop your queen knight first, and wait to develop your queen bishop, once the pawn tension on c4 has been resolved. ...a6 is a universal move, in these positions, that can make this process relatively easy.

Here are three common lines that you might face:

There's a lot to learn in the QGD, but it gets easier to understand, the more you study it.

A-mateur

Thank you very much for your answer. The lines you gave are interesting, I will certainly try the Orthodox. 

TwoMove

If you like the early Nb-d7 line suggested, a small tweak is to play it before h6. Then can answer BXN with NxB.  Alekhine played this a6 idea in the world championship match against Capablanca.  In the common structure after c4xd5 e6xd5, black is slightly worse than normal but it doesn't matter much. 

Another Alekhine idea is after 8...c6 in the some called fight for tempo line 9a3 a6 10Qc2 Re8! white doesn't have better than 11Bd3 in the end 11...pxp 12Bxp b5 the idea is after white plays Ba2-b1 black isn't in danger of being mated. 

Botskyvinnik
I’d recommend also checking out the Alatortsev Variation of the QGD: 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Be7.

The Alatortsev avoids the modern QGD exchange lines where 3…Nf6 would give white a potentially annoying bishop pin opportunity following exchange and 5.Bg5. Mainline QGD lines otherwise transpose following 4.Nf3.
tygxc

„He who fears an isolated Queen's Pawn should give up Chess.“ - Tarrasch

yetanotheraoc

https://exeterchessclub.org.uk/content/defending-against-1d4

He looks at 26 defenses, with example games (but some bug in the pgn parser around the h3/h4 squares, I had to fix a lot of typos to get the games to play through).

DrDave on 2009.09.27 wrote:
"My recommendations for junior and club players usually run to:"

  • Swiss Defence (what @Stil1 recommended here in reply #2)
  • Cambridge Springs
  • Tarrasch Defence
  • Noteboom
  • Benkö Gambit
  • Nimzo-Indian

 

orlock20

Colle to QGD back to Colle. It pushes while defends the pieces.  You can trade down to an end game without hanging pieces.  There are some lines on how to work the queen and king pawns, but the engine says take. So you move your queen pawn up to squares, they push a pawn for you to take it, just take it for example.

adityasaxena4

 

QGD : Austrian Variation 

adityasaxena4

 

QGD : Austrian Variation , extremely rare queen trap

adityasaxena4

 

QGD : Austrian Variation 

one of the probably possible positions 

Stil1
tygxc wrote:

„He who fears an isolated Queen's Pawn should give up Chess.“ - Tarrasch

"The essential disadvantage of the isolated pawn ... lies not in the pawn itself, but in the square in front of the pawn." — Richard Reti

tongue.png

Granted, an isolated queen pawn can be quite dynamic, if you're able to advance it. But if you can't, and your opponent blockades it with a piece, they're likely to have a rather comfortable game.

magipi

My advice is to stop thinking about openings. Practically any opening is fine (as long as it is not some dumb troll opening like the bongcloud). Chess games are decided in the middlegame (or occasionally in the endgame), not in the opening. If you want to improve, improve your calculation skills by solving puzzles.

https://www.chess.com/puzzles

Additionally, watching instructive chess videos or reading books are also good.

A-mateur
magipi a écrit :

My advice is to stop thinking about openings. Practically any opening is fine (as long as it is not some dumb troll opening like the bongcloud). Chess games are decided in the middlegame (or occasionally in the endgame), not in the opening. If you want to improve, improve your calculation skills by solving puzzles.

https://www.chess.com/puzzles

Additionally, watching instructive chess videos or reading books are also good.

Of course the opening is not the most important thing, but if I don't get a decent position after the opening I won't be able to play the middlegame as well as I could have with a better position. I don't see how I can improve if my position on move 10 is already clearly inferior because I played an opening without knowing the ideas behind it. 

 

I'm not searching for a complete knowledge of all the lines of a variation of the QGD, I'm just looking for the basic strategic ideas and the thematic moves of a variation of the QGD.  "Learning an opening" at my level of course doesn't have the same meaning it has for a player rated 1800 or more.