It is favorable because Black's Bishop is outside the pawn chain. Actually, it should not really be compared to the French, but rather, the Caro-Kann.
What you have is a Caro-Kann up a tempo.
The French sees the Bishop buried behind the pawn chain.
In the Advance Caro-Kann, usually you see 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 Bf5 4.Nf3 e6 5.Be2 and Black eventually needs to play ...c5 to break the center. It took you 2 moves of the c-pawn to play the c-pawn to c5.
The French usually does this in one move, but at the cost of playing ...e6 before getting the Bishop out.
Here, the Bishop is out AND you got c7-c5 in 1 move. The best of both worlds!
3.e5 is NOT a good move, just like how 2.e5 is bad in the Scandinavian for the same reasons!
Hi everybody! In the above mentioned anti-Sicilian lines, at least at my level, a frequent instinct by White is the bypass e5. My sources claim this is bad for White and that after ...Bf5 and ...e6, Black has transposed to "a favorable version of the French Advance." My question is - WHY is this a "favorable version of the French Advance" for Black and what is Black's game from there? For example, when I have tried the French Advance as White, Black usually tries to press on d4 with ...Qb6, ...Nc6, ...Ne7-f5, or pile on the open c-file, etc....