Would a chess teacher like my opening repertoire?

I don't have a chess teacher, but study chess a lot at home.  I have studied tactics through practice and chessmaster.  Know quite a bit about positional play.  I know lots a strategy and studied the endgame.  And I just have a good sense of chess.  I would probably be rated around 1500 if I played (I'm looking forward to, and will start playing in clubs).  I have also started looking at openings.

However, my openings are generally openings that are not really popular and go against the really popular openings.

I use the:

Scotch Game

Four Knights (Mainly Scotch Variation)

Danish Gambit

Smith Morra Gambit (I use it to get into the lines of the Danish with 1. e4 c5 2. d4 cxd4 3. c3 dxc3 4. Bc4 cxb2 5. Bxb2 ...)  I don't know if this is a good idea but I like it.

King's Gambit

Petrov Defense

Black Diemer Gambit

Benko Gambit

I will study the Ruy Lopez, Sicilian, French, Phillador's, and Dutch defense just because they are common openings that should be known, but probably won't use them too much.

I really like my openings because they are the kind of openings that will really piss people off and get them out of their comfort zone.  You know they'll be playing the Sicilian thinking, "Oh what a nice day to have a normal clean Sicilian chess game."  Then I piss them off with using the Smith-Morra Gambit to get to the Danish lines, and it's completely off from their style.  As you can tell, I love open games.  That's why I like lots of these openings.  

Same with the Scotch Game.  They'll think, "Ah, the Ruy Lopez." Then you play the Scotch and they get really pissed!  

I need to study the declined variations but since they usually accept it, it's been working really well for me.

However, would a chess teacher like my repertoire because it is an unusual set of openings that are rebellious against the common openings?

As a 1200, don't worry about openings. Just choose something you like, and go with it. I play the Parham, and don't worry about theory.

No I know openings isn't a big part of play.

It's not to piss my opponent off that I use this openings.  It's that I like these openings a lot.  I play different ones depending on what my oponent starts out with.  Against 1. e4, I play the Petrov Defense.  

I know that mostly strategy is what will matter.  I just wanted to have some openings in my mind ready just so I know what I'm doing.  But yeah, after knowing the common ones, I will go back to serious strategical training.

I already do focus on tactics.  I know that openings are my whole chess LIFE.  Like I said, I just wanted to have some good ones up my sleeve rather than being totally uneducated.  I also know the general "principles" of opening play too.  

what are tatics by the way whats that mean

it's like skewers, pins, removing the defender, sacrificing, discovered attacks, mating, and all of that kind of play

when i was around 1200 the only opening i knew was ruy lopez exchange variation. 

I will go through your list one at a time

Scotch Game - Yes, can become part of your opening repertoire for otb tournaments.

Four Knights(mainly for Scotch variation) - No, save his for club play, internet play, and blitz.  It is good for one other thing teaching you about transpositions in openings.

Danish Gambit - No, save this for club play interpernet play, and blitz.

Smith Morra Gambit - No, save this for club play, internet play, and blitz.

There are 2 reasons: 

Smith-Morra Gambit Declined - 1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 c3 Nf6 (look it up if you haven't already) In this opening takes you out of the Smith-Morra and you end up playing a c3 Sicilian(Alapin)

Smith Morra Gambit Accepted - 1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.Nxc3 d6 5.Nf3 Nc6 6.Bc4 a6! (look it up if you haven't already) Check out, "How to Defeat the Smith-Morra Gambit: 6...a6", by Timothy Taylor. It is a free download on the internet and it is a book that fits your present rating.  Also, check out "Defending the Smith-Morra", by Mark Ginsburg. It also is a free download on the internet.

The Smith-Morra Gambit gets you a tempi maybe 2 for the sacrifice of a pawn.  It is insufficient compensation you are down a pawn and Black has a 2(pawns on d6),e7 vs. 1 (pawn on e4).  You need to be very lucky to find the one opponent in an otb tournament that doesn't know it.  Any player who plays the Sicilian 1.e4 c5 is going to be booke up on all the anti-sicilians.  The Smith Morra is alot like the Stonewall in the Colle System.  White is stuck with a very inflexible plan and if Black knows the plan he plays a variation of the KID that just stops it cold and you end up with a bad position out of the opening.  The basic plan in the Smith-Morra for White is get on B to c4, the other to g5, his Q on e2 and his Rs on c1 and d1.  Black easily frustrates that plan beginning with ...a6 denying White the essential b5 square for his N.

King's Gambit - No, save this for club play, internet play, and blitz.

Petrov Defense - Yes, possible back up to Caro-Kann for when you need a draw in an otb tournament.

Blackmar Diemer Gambit - No, save this forclub play, internet play, and blitz.

Benko Gambit - No, save this for club play, internet play, and blitz.

In summary, at your stage of development as a chess player it is better to concentrate on tactics and endgames.  You can still play around with openings  

I disagree a lot with transpo. At the level of chess OP is playing, all those openings are perfectly acceptable. They will give you rather clear plans of what to do, and they certainly aren't losing. Sure, when you improve a great deal, you'd probably need to move on to other openings, but there's no reason to avoid these at this point in time. Given their tactical natures, they are in fact easier to understand, imo, than some of the more mainline openings, making them better suited for you right now.

I dissagree with you're relagating the KG to club/internet/Blitz, I am undefeated OTB with it, and I am quite happy with it, mainly because instead of the knights gambit I play 3. Bc4 instead, but yeah sorry just could not accept the KG being bashed

No chess teacher is going to advise you to play gambits at your level. There is no point in it. Play sound openings instead.

don't worry about openings so much, focus on tactics for now.

Ok As a coach...

It your level it is good to experiment but some of this depends on your long term goals. IMO your being too broad at the moment. 
I show my students a few of yours but currently I like

1) scotch 4 knights _ great opening for all levels from world champ on down! the recent Kramnik-Aronian rapid game was a Scotch 4 knights albeit a sideline with ...Bc5. at your level you will get a lot of mistakes played by white to that look good but you can punish ruthlessly. (starting out: scotch and i think gary lane had one too thats good enough to get you rollin)

2) pick a solid siclian unless you have a god given memory. taimanov, Accelerated dragon  or if your feeling a bit wild the 4 knights siclian.

Taimanov- Chess stars I believe its called the easist sicilian

Accelerated dragon theres a new book and I really liked accelerated dragon by Watson.

4 knights - Classical siclian  by yermolinsky

3) against d4 I would pick something classical. the tarrasch works against almost anything white can play and gives you good piece play. it is sound enough for GMs but easy enough to get you going at the novice level.|
The tarrasch defense - aagaard 

You can vary some of this but for now focus on those.

 keep it simple for a year then start to rotate the systems out. play them all the time until you get the basics down> you will learn typical attack patterns and piece placement. review your longer games each time to see if you played well. Play 3-5 min games just to get the typical mistakes out of the way.. and have fun..

so what is your opinion of the KG, chess coach guy

it is ok but there are some wacky lines. I prefer to havethings are more in control incase a mistake is made your not just down a piece and a demolished kingside. If you like those sort of positions though go for it, a 2600 player (Federov) played it quite often.

My only other problem is that it doesnt fit into other systems structurally so when you want to switch to a serious system the tabiya of the King's gambit (pawn structures) dont really translate well to other systems. It is great for learning some fun sacs though and learning the initative but giving up a knight isnt everyones cup of tea.

wait I don't play the knights gambit, I play the Bc4 line( 1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Bc4)

Not dubious at all, just  things can get out of control so most players at the serious level tend to avoid it .they like to play for two results (win-draw) instead of all three (win-lose-draw). even Carlsen whipped it out recently to the surprise of his opponent, he won. 

I played the Colle System as white, QGD Lasker and Sicilian Kan Variation as Black at the 1200 level.  They are all really fun and easy and really I only knew them up to move 5 or 6.

The thing to focus on at 1200 is not dropping peices, and tactics.  

I got whooped by a seven year old FIDE rated @2100 and he told me "You should take some lessons".    I smiled and asked him if he had any advice for me.

His response was "tactics" and nothing else.  Focus on tactics.  He said "Until you are rated at least 1700, games will only be won because of tactics not openings". He had a coach and all that so he must know something.

It's human nature/compulsion to want to study openings I think.

Against 1.d4 the Tarrasch that's the only one I can reccomend based upon anything other than personal preference.

Jetfighter...  I love playing the Kings Gamibt

You should join the KG group..  follow this link 

http://www.chess.com/groups/home/kings-gambit-players2

If you play Smith Morra you need to be careful, as black has some sharp tries too, with attacking chances and an extra pawn.

And as for general advice: Don't study specific lines at your level, but rather review general pieces. Try to develop pieces before initiating an attack or moving pawns unnecesarily (I've beaten a few 1300- players simply because they move too many pawns and get behind in development). Be on the lookout for tactics, and as you get further into the game identify general strategies, pawn breaks, etc. for both sides. Try to prevent your opponents pawn breaks (usually can be achieved through basic development and placing rooks on central files aiming at queen or king, where pawn breaks create pins), and try to achieve your own. Double check every move to make sure it doesn't lose material, and look for all of your opponents checks and captures. If you can do this you should easily clear 1600.