They could have provided the proof to the daily members.
Kulinarist's account closed?
Sort:
ssakash wrote:
They could have provided the proof to the daily members.
So other people know how to avoid the detection systems.
They also have the (sensible) position of not discussing account closures with other users.
That's a plausible reason. Though, I still think they could have addressed it a little better.
Feb 24, 2015
0
#45
KirbyCake wrote:
i don't see where is the evidence of cheating
Staff has got it and won't disclose it.
Feb 24, 2015
0
#46
ssakash wrote:
question: where is the proof of him cheating ?
In chess.com's private files.
what if he just closed his account mid-game? :o
Feb 24, 2015
0
#48
Mtx01 wrote:
I just wish a more detailed explanation was given.
His games were always inspiring for me and I often ended up going through his blitz games and trying to learn new things. There was something appealing about his playing style that I can't find in any matches of other high rated players on chess.com.
I hope he comes back.
The detailed explanation is : "he was using an engine to pick his moves". Capito ?
And don't worry, all cheaters come back : they know chess.com is such a comfy place for them, isn't it ?
hicetnunc wrote:
The detailed explanation is : "he was using an engine to pick his moves". Capito ?
And don't worry, all cheaters come back : they know chess.com is such a comfy place for them, isn't it ?
You're not part of the staff team as far as i know. Accounts can get closed for reasons other than using an engine.
Feb 24, 2015
0
#50
Eseles wrote:
ssakash wrote:
how could they prove that he has cheated and, why would a FM cheat anyway ?
i'm gonna reverse your question:
why would chesscom ban someone -and especially a titled player- if they didn't have enough evidence?
@Eseles : please have a look at how old the account who asks these kind of question is 
Mtx01 wrote:
hicetnunc wrote:
The detailed explanation is : "he was using an engine to pick his moves". Capito ?
And don't worry, all cheaters come back : they know chess.com is such a comfy place for them, isn't it ?
You're not part of the staff team as far as i know. Accounts can get closed for reasons other than using an engine.
But they don't have the cheater symbol in that case. This one does.
Feb 24, 2015
0
#52
ssakash wrote:
They could have provided the proof to the daily members.
Why do you want to know ? Want to try it yourself ?
Scottrf wrote:
But they don't have the cheater symbol in that case. This one does.
what cheater symbol? (genuine question). I only see "Account closed" next to his name, if you hover over the little icon.
Mtx01 wrote:
Scottrf wrote:
But they don't have the cheater symbol in that case. This one does.
what cheater symbol? (genuine question). I only see "Account closed" next to his name, if you hover over the little icon.
The person with the red no entry sign is the cheating symbol.
Feb 24, 2015
0
#56
Mtx01 wrote:
Scottrf wrote:
But they don't have the cheater symbol in that case. This one does.
what cheater symbol? (genuine question). I only see "Account closed" next to his name, if you hover over the little icon.
this symbol mean you have been cheating.
Feb 24, 2015
0
#57
Mtx01 wrote:
Scottrf wrote:
But they don't have the cheater symbol in that case. This one does.
what cheater symbol? (genuine question). I only see "Account closed" next to his name, if you hover over the little icon.
kco wrote:
a picture is worth a thousand words scotty.
A picture is more effort 
He must have cheated. Chess.com only bans someone if there is a definite proof of cheating. End of.