LOL
Vladimir Kramnik closed his Chess.com account
Sort:
9 hrs ago
0
#3
and in case u somehow don't know who he is, he basically just accused a bunch of people of cheating without having any actual evidence, and no one really takes him seriously
9 hrs ago
0
#6
no, no way he closed his entire account for some random people, he closed after losing badly in Titled Tuesday yesterday, here's the video I found: https://youtu.be/DA0A5QzZTwk?si=5BWtvn2On3uRADMM
8 hrs ago
0
#10
He's honestly just a sore loser ... He's 50 years old so obviously his skillz are going to decline
Timmeh2007 wrote:
no, no way he closed his entire account for some random people, he closed after losing badly in Titled Tuesday yesterday, here's the video I found: https://youtu.be/DA0A5QzZTwk?si=5BWtvn2On3uRADMM
But he played 4 more games after that, losing 2
do you really think that literally retards can beat a former world champion that is still in an excellent shape? do you think guys that have in reality a 2000 elo can reach a 3000+ elo online? and this shi. happens all the time online. if you really think that this is normal i am not sure what to say.
but to be honest manipulation in reality is of course also real. there r no children that can get a GM title. only in this manipulated staged fake world such shi. happens. and if the so called super gms only play closed tournaments alone this is already a form of manipulation.
Joshua Waitzkin was a highly talented chess junior player of the USA. He got an professional education by an IM. Nevertheless he had "only" an IM title with 17 when he suddenly stopped playing chess. This is real. A highly talented human that get professional support can may be get the GM-title with 19 or so when he start with an age of 6. This can happen. The rest is staged bs.
how humans can play theoretically players like bronstein, tal or keres showed. a few days ago rapport played a game in the kings indian where i say this game is not human at all and humans couldnt even theoretically play like this. this was a total computer generated game. it has also nothing to do with calculation because this nobody can calculate and it has also nothing to do with intuition. conclusion this game was staged. who has success and who hasnt is decided by the id. who rule over this planet. it has nothing to do with your talent at all.
2 hrs ago
0
#15
Hochdeutscher wrote:
do you really think that literally retards can beat a former world champion that is still in an excellent shape? do you think guys that have in reality a 2000 elo can reach a 3000+ elo online? and this shi. happens all the time online. if you really think that this is normal i am not sure what to say.
but to be honest manipulation in reality is of course also real. there r no children that can get a GM title. only in this manipulated staged fake world such shi. happens. and if the so called super gms only play closed tournaments alone this is already a form of manipulation.
Joshua Waitzkin was a highly talented chess junior player of the USA. He got an professional education by an IM. Nevertheless he had "only" an IM title with 17 when he suddenly stopped playing chess. This is real. A highly talented human that get professional support can may be get the GM-title with 19 or so when he start with an age of 6. This can happen. The rest is staged bs.
how humans can play theoretically players like bronstein, tal or keres showed. a few days ago rapport played a game in the kings indian where i say this game is not human at all and humans couldnt even theoretically play like this. this was a total computer generated game. it has also nothing to do with calculation because this nobody can calculate and it has also nothing to do with intuition. conclusion this game was staged. who has success and who hasnt is decided by the id. who rule over this planet. it has nothing to do with your talent at all.
He just made terrible blunders under time pressure, nothing suspicious from opponent, very easy to spot and capitalize off of kramniks mistakes
2 hrs ago
0
#16
basically 2800 and kramnik is only like a 250 point difference regardless of fide title and lower rated player can win all the time
bigshortsoup68 hat geschrieben:
Hochdeutscher wrote:
do you really think that literally retards can beat a former world champion that is still in an excellent shape? do you think guys that have in reality a 2000 elo can reach a 3000+ elo online? and this shi. happens all the time online. if you really think that this is normal i am not sure what to say.
but to be honest manipulation in reality is of course also real. there r no children that can get a GM title. only in this manipulated staged fake world such shi. happens. and if the so called super gms only play closed tournaments alone this is already a form of manipulation.
Joshua Waitzkin was a highly talented chess junior player of the USA. He got an professional education by an IM. Nevertheless he had "only" an IM title with 17 when he suddenly stopped playing chess. This is real. A highly talented human that get professional support can may be get the GM-title with 19 or so when he start with an age of 6. This can happen. The rest is staged bs.
how humans can play theoretically players like bronstein, tal or keres showed. a few days ago rapport played a game in the kings indian where i say this game is not human at all and humans couldnt even theoretically play like this. this was a total computer generated game. it has also nothing to do with calculation because this nobody can calculate and it has also nothing to do with intuition. conclusion this game was staged. who has success and who hasnt is decided by the id. who rule over this planet. it has nothing to do with your talent at all.
He just made terrible blunders under time pressure, nothing suspicious from opponent, very easy to spot and capitalize off of kramniks mistakes
Its very easy to bring Kramnik in time pressure, right? Well of course it is possible if the guy for example is using engine support or a time cheat. there are many ways to manipulate and to cheat. it can also be a time cheat. if i give a 2600 player 3 minutes and kramnik 1 minute then Kramnik will lose although he is may be clearly the better player.
but as I said also the reality is manipulated. for example if you want a elo of 2600 this means if you play a 2200 player u should win 99 games of 100 if this number shall has anything to do with reality. but in my eyes how the big majority of GMs are playing this game namely like grandpas on valium i highly doubt that anybody of them would even win an open tournament. okay. and if this is true what i am saying here then this means the ELO numbers. the official ELO numbers are already manipulated and not real at all.
https://www.chess.com/member/vladimirkramnik
I guess he's had enough of chess.com not thinking the "evidence" is clear enough to do "the procedure."
very very interesting