ok actually taimanov should have been enough to know you were joking, yes you are right.. taimanov had playable game against Fischer i suppose, but still that doesnt mean Fischer is not the supremo in openings.
Who had the best opening, middle game and endgame ever?
Ok then i change my wording. He was the strongest middlegameplayer and in my opinion also the strongest in the opening.

The best openings player was probabley ernst Grunfeld
Max Euwe would probabley fit into the middle game
and there are so many for the endgame
Magnus could fit into all but the opening
i also would say Fischer belongs to the strongest middlegame player. Fischer had even a won endgame against botvinnik from the middle game and then blundered to a draw.
And yes Fischer was remarkably an all rounder, and its remarkable that as a dutch you name euwe and not alekhine. I like the dutch, but in my honest opinion you cant name euwe and leave out alekhine, in my weak opinion euwe was nowere near the class of alekhine.

Personally, I think Capablanca's endgame was the best. Middle game' I believe, is Carleson's. The opening, I'm not sure about.
to be very honest i find your middlegame players very random hoynk. i wont believe anyone of those was stronger then Fischer in the middlegame.
and didnt Fischer crush Portisch in the middlegame buy the way? i thikn he also crushed smyslov in the middlegame but i might remember it incorrectly.

If you're gonna mention Sveshnikov and Najdorf, you should also mention Igor Zaitsev and Kurt Richter (and perhaps Polugaevsky and Ljubojevic). Richter's attempt to prove that 1.e4 was winning led to some amazing opening discoveries in the Sicilian and the French. Zaitsev revolutionized play in the Spanish and other openings.
Of course, whenever I think of the French Defense, I think of Aron Nimzovich.
Akiba Rubinstein invented the main white response to the Queen's Gambit Tarrasch, one of the most important ideas against the Nimzo-Indian, and of course the main line of the Two Knights Defense, among other opening accomplishments.
i think when you take the strongest endgame players i thikn its difficult to say he was better or he. Also maybe there are even stronger endgame players, but we never heard of them because they never survived the middlegame

but ofc Kasparov team was great, and thinking that Roman dzindzi got hired by borth Kasparov and Karpov he was especially great but i believe in my opinion even so you are the stronger player i believe, Fischer was way ahead of all.
Will you stop spreading nonsensical FUD? Please?
Dzindzi was NEVER a second or collaborator of Karpov, or Kasparov. Factly, when he was still in former USSR, he wasn't even a Grandmaster.
He was a second (in tandem with Viacheslav Osnos) to Korchnoi, in his match against Karpov, and Korchnoi was very negative in his comments about the quality of their analytical work.

Just an opinon, Fischer...Carlsen...Fine.
Fine...Not my choice, but an interesting one :-)
I can guarantee that in any endeavour if one lets another entity do most of their work for them, they won't get anywhere. They can be assisted sure, but the real bulk of the work has to come from the individual.
EDIT: Manufactured pop stars aside.
He has not left a lasting mark in opening theory?? man now i know you are trolling...sorry smyslov i totally missed that in your text and only saw it the second time, when i read it again.