Chess on an Infinite Plane (vickalan - captaintugwash)

Sort:
Avatar of captaintugwash

14... B(0,11)

Avatar of vickalan

14.B(8,3)...B(0,11)
15.(9,4)


Avatar of captaintugwash

Oops sorry I kinda forgot about this. I'll move tomorrow, top priority. 

Avatar of captaintugwash

15... N(10,4)

Avatar of captaintugwash

I kept looking at N(6,4), and finally concluded it was a blunder because Bx(4,7) followed by K(6,1) and my knight is trapped. Eventually I noticed it was a more direct blunder because the bishop on (0,-2) controls (6,4) and can simply grab it. Can't believe how long I missed that bishop for. 

Avatar of vickalan
captaintugwash wrote:

...because the bishop on (0,-2) controls (6,4)...

On my last move I had to make a strong mental note about this bishop too. Forgetting about him would definitely have altered my play too (and so obviously the total game).

Avatar of vickalan

15.(9,4)...N(10,4)
16.B(6,5)


Avatar of captaintugwash

16... H(9,6)

Avatar of vickalan

Sorry for the delay.
16.B(6,5) ...H(9,6)
17.(11,3)


Avatar of captaintugwash

It's fine, I'm not exactly playing fast! It's summer and I'm spending a lot more time outside.

17... N(11,6)

Avatar of vickalan

17.(11,3)...N(11,6)
18.(8,4)


Avatar of vickalan

After 17 moves, you've only moved one pawn, and he moved one square.😅
(this is not a comment on strategy, strength, or weakness - just an observation).😐

Avatar of captaintugwash

Once you've moved a pawn, it can't move back. Your pawns are much more advanced, but it leaves holes behind. For example, the (5,3) square, which is adequately controlled by you right now, but your pawns can never attack this square now. I'm definitely more reluctant to move pawns in infinite than bulldog. I'm not saying it's the right strategy, but there's a reason I don't move my pawns.

Avatar of captaintugwash

18... (7,6)

Avatar of vickalan
captaintugwash wrote:

...I'm definitely more reluctant to move pawns in infinite than bulldog. I'm not saying it's the right strategy, but there's a reason I don't move my pawns.

Yeah, your (former) queen-side hawk is being much more daring than any of your pawns.grin.png

Avatar of vickalan

18.(8,4)...(7,6)
19.B(7,4)


Avatar of captaintugwash

Ok let's take a risk, spark this game into life. I think this weakens your pawn structure enough to justify giving up hawk for bishop.

19... Hx(7,4)

Avatar of vickalan
captaintugwash wrote:

...I think this weakens your pawn structure enough to justify giving up hawk for bishop.

Hmmm, we'll see.  It definitely changes the tension.shock.png

Avatar of vickalan

19.B(7,4)...Hx(7,4)
20.Px(7,4)


Avatar of captaintugwash

It's an interesting imbalance. I think the hawk is the better piece in general, but not by much, and my light squared bishop is now potentially stronger because you don't have a light bishop to challenge it. With the weakened pawns, it's surely playable, though probably not optimal.