50Mark vs Anonymous
Functional Exchanged chess
Sort:
50Mark vs Anonymous
50Mark vs Anonymous
50Mark vs Anonymous
50Mark vs Anonymous
50Mark vs Anonymous
Fischer 960 is fun , but is really cool that you thought up this idea; it would definitely add some challenge for people.
People care a great deal about the appearance of the pieces, just have a look at the forum about chess sets.
I have played on a digital board with pawns representing every piece. That was cool and a step towards playing blindfold I guess 
DanielJackson wrote:
Fischer 960 is fun , but is really cool that you thought up this idea; it would definitely add some challenge for people.
People care a great deal about the appearance of the pieces, just have a look at the forum about chess sets.
I have played on a digital board with pawns representing every piece. That was cool and a step towards playing blindfold I guess
I don't know whether the exchange appearance couldn't distract someone's pattern recognition.
Whether blindfold player doesn't memorize the classical pattern while this variant pieces appearance will deceive the classical appearance.
50Mark wrote:
I proposed new variant to diminish memorization in chess play.Everybody have different capability in memorizing moves lines in chess play.This differences will give advantage to the one of both player.It create an unbalanced initial condition in this play.To overcome memorization,we can exchange the functional move of a piece with other piece.For instance,the functional move of bishops could be exchanged with knight moves.So,the intial board setup is shown below.The way bishop moves was changed into the way knight moves.By this way,the player memorization is being disrupted by different appearance of it's pieces figure.The player will be more concern on this new appearances and tactical also positional moves rather than remembering the next moves lines they got used to play.
The exchanges can also be made between rook and knight or another possible combination involving rook,bishop,and knight functional exchanges.Finally,the true winner is the one who more responsive to new changes.
Does this sound like a Minecraft 1.9 update supporter? "We are tired of getting wrecked so lets just reset everything" lol
It is the options of board games.
Is there anybody want to include this variant to their site ?
Aug 9, 2020
0
#173
My move:
1...Rb8c6
2...d7d5
3...Bc8f5
4...Qd8d6
5...O~O~O
6...e7e5
7...e5e4
8...Rg8f6
9...Rc6xb4
10...Qd6xb4
11...Qb4xb3
12...Bf8d6
13...g7g5
14...a7a6
15...Rf6g4
Sep 2, 2023
0
#174
50Mark wrote:
While we await @BattleChessGN18 to come back
I came back quite some time ago. We're waiting for you now; to make your next move.
It's your turn, White.
Feb 23, 2025
0
#175
Okay. Well. You haven't logged on for two years now.
I will officially claim victory due to insufficient time.
Of course, that doesn't mean much, if anything, I'm sure. After all, this was a test run game. 
Feb 23, 2025
0
#176
We could do functional exchanged prime numbers. 6 means 1 and 1 means 6.
So now 16 is a prime number and 11 isn't.
I'll write a paper about this and see if some prestigious journal is interested.
50Mark vs Anonymous