CHESS PLATFORM IS A JOKE

Sort:
Avatar of josedayvisson

THE CHESS.COM PLATFORM IS A REAL JOKE AND MAKING MORE AND MORE IDIOTS USERS, IN ADDITION TO THE CURRENT PROBLEM THAT THE GREAT MOST OF USERS HERE HAVE BEEN FACING, WHICH IS COMMUNICATION FAILURES, ESPECIALLY WHEN WE ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF A MATCH AND SIMPLY THE CONNECTION IS LOST OR APPEARS OUT OF NOTHING YOU MISSED THE MATCH BECAUSE THE TIME IS OVER, AND YOU HAD ENOUGH TIME TO PLAY, THIS IS REVOLTING AND GETS RIDICULOUS. AND ANOTHER PROBLEM THAT ALSO REVOLTS IS THE LOGIC USED BY THEM IN RELATION TO THE GAMES, WHERE A COMPLETELY DESCABBLE AND INTOLERABLE LOGIC IS IMPLEMENTED. Just below there are two matches I played today, where the first match resulted in a draw, as the platform claimed that due to lack of material the match was ended and delivering a draw for both players.

(MATCH THAT CAUSED A DRAW)

  

In this second game just below, I lost. And as you can see, the amount of material I had was visibly lower than the previous game and even so the platform did not end the game due to lack of material, it simply continued the game until finally my opponent finished me with a checkmate. . In short, he insists on saying that these grotesque failures that occur in an irresponsible way, have been making this platform totally lose its credibility, unfortunately.

(DEPARTURE THAT CAUSED MY DEFEAT)

Avatar of justbefair

You evidently never learned about stalemate. In your first position, you have stalemated your opponent.  They have no legal moves but are not in check.

For the last several hundred years, that has been declared a draw.

In the second one, you got checkmated.  You have no legal moves but you are in check.

There is a difference.

Avatar of josedayvisson

I disagree with you, because in several moments in the game I was in a deadlock position, where my opponent made a mistake in the positioning of his pieces several times, allowing me only to move the king, where another absurd error on the part of the platform occurred, because with the limited movement of the king, I had to repeat the movement of the king at least 10 times and the platform did not end the game claiming the excessive repetition. It doesn't make any sense to me and logic has gone a long way in this regard.

(SOME OF THE PREVIOUS PLAYS)

Avatar of josedayvisson

Remembering that a few moves before, I repeated the king's move at least 10 times and even then the platform did not end the game.

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
josedayvisson wrote:

I disagree with you, because in several moments in the game I was in a deadlock position, where my opponent made a mistake in the positioning of his pieces several times, allowing me only to move the king, where another absurd error on the part of the platform occurred, because with the limited movement of the king, I had to repeat the movement of the king at least 10 times and the platform did not end the game claiming the excessive repetition. It doesn't make any sense to me and logic has gone a long way in this regard.

(SOME OF THE PREVIOUS PLAYS)

 

The rule is not move repetition but triple repetition of position. All pieces have to be on exactly the same squares and the same side has to be on the move each time for the repetition to count.

Avatar of josedayvisson
Martin_Stahl escreveu:
josedayvisson wrote:

I disagree with you, because in several moments in the game I was in a deadlock position, where my opponent made a mistake in the positioning of his pieces several times, allowing me only to move the king, where another absurd error on the part of the platform occurred, because with the limited movement of the king, I had to repeat the movement of the king at least 10 times and the platform did not end the game claiming the excessive repetition. It doesn't make any sense to me and logic has gone a long way in this regard.

(SOME OF THE PREVIOUS PLAYS)

 

The rule is not move repetition but triple repetition of position. All pieces have to be on exactly the same squares and the same side has to be on the move each time for the repetition to count.

I don't know if you understood, but the images I posted do not refer to the moment when the repetitions took place, the repetitions occurred a few moves before the ones in which I placed the images, these images I placed so that you could verify that on that occasion there was an impasse in the my movements, just like my first challenge.

Avatar of Sack_o_Potatoes

@MartinStahl is soooooo right

Avatar of Sack_o_Potatoes
josedayvisson wrote:
Martin_Stahl escreveu:
josedayvisson wrote:

I disagree with you, because in several moments in the game I was in a deadlock position, where my opponent made a mistake in the positioning of his pieces several times, allowing me only to move the king, where another absurd error on the part of the platform occurred, because with the limited movement of the king, I had to repeat the movement of the king at least 10 times and the platform did not end the game claiming the excessive repetition. It doesn't make any sense to me and logic has gone a long way in this regard.

(SOME OF THE PREVIOUS PLAYS)

 

The rule is not move repetition but triple repetition of position. All pieces have to be on exactly the same squares and the same side has to be on the move each time for the repetition to count.

I don't know if you understood, but the images I posted do not refer to the moment when the repetitions took place, the repetitions occurred a few moves before the ones in which I placed the images, these images I placed so that you could verify that on that occasion there was an impasse in the my movements, just like my first challenge.

keep in mind he’s 1000+ rating points above u

Avatar of Sack_o_Potatoes
Sack_o_Potatoes wrote:

@MartinStahl is soooooo right

whoops i meant @Martin_Stahl

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
josedayvisson wrote:

I don't know if you understood, but the images I posted do not refer to the moment when the repetitions took place, the repetitions occurred a few moves before the ones in which I placed the images, these images I placed so that you could verify that on that occasion there was an impasse in the my movements, just like my first challenge.

 

My initial post was to clarify that the moves don't really matter and one player moving back and forth is not enough to repeat positions.

 

I have looked at the actual game and move 63 was the first time a repetition could have occurred, based on your initial image.

 

Moves 63 and 67 were two repetitions and you were checkmated the next move. There were no other repetitions of position.

 

 

Avatar of Jalex13
Too bad
Avatar of YChess

Bruh. Can you read chess terms and play chess?

Avatar of YChess

https://chess.com/terms 

Avatar of peeko4

bruh learn chess, @Martin_Stahl is right, and chess.com is not a joke

Avatar of friscolives

The first game is clearly a stalemate ending. The king can not put himself in check and thus has no legal move. It is a stalemate/draw. Second game is a checkmate, very clear you lost.

Avatar of HowardRoark24

 r/confidentlyincorect   and you screaming it on top of it.

Avatar of CherryMyMuffins

Not Chess.com's fault, you really just need to learn the chess rules properly.

Avatar of magipi

How could it be possible to play over 9000 games without ever encountering stalemate? It smells like trolling to me.

Avatar of Pulpofeira
magipi escribió:

How could it be possible to play over 9000 games without ever encountering stalemate? It smells like trolling to me.

Especially in those kind of games, with an unlimited supply of major pieces.

Avatar of KevinOSh

There is an old saying "a poor carpenter blames his tools".

Learning to avoid stalemate and threefold repetition is a lot more constructive than trying to put the blame on this site.