I don't know about these courses in particular, but Chessable courses are usually better regarded, which is unsurprising when you have to fork out a large chunk of the price of an annual chess.com membership for some of them.
Chessable courses compared to chess.com
Sort:
Jul 2, 2024
0
#4
ive never like the courses on chess.com and i dont pay for chessable i think if i do get a chessable account ill replace my chess.com one and only use it if i decide to learn the sicillian (ive been keeping a bunch of free trials for this plus watched yt vids so like a month of non stop studying).
overall i think u dont need to use puzzles on chess.com (there r a bunch or free sites)nor the lessons part (yt or in this case chessable) so the only thing you would miss out on is the game review but apart from the dopamine from a brilliant u can just use stockfish
(chess.com owns chessable btw so they dont care if i say this)
8 hrs ago
0
#7
What I know about chessable that it’s incredibly expensive and wants money for each variant or opening.
I put this here since it doesn't just cover tactics, openings or ... .
Basicly I am wondering how Chessable compares to everything available on chess.com (I have a diamond subscription, so full acces)
How do puzzles compare to (for example) The woodpecker method on Chessable. (https://www.chessable.com/the-woodpecker-method/course/10582/)
There is a lovely section about openings on chess.com (https://www.chess.com/lessons/openings) but then again, there is a lot of good stuff on Chessable aswell. (I found the openings that suit me on Chessable aswell)
Same for endgame. The lessons are good but how does it compare to https://www.chessable.com/100-endgames-you-must-know/course/5193/ (or any other endgame course, ofcourse)