Computer people?

Sort:
dmxn2k
RedTatsu256 wrote:
dmxn2k wrote:
RedTatsu256 wrote:

I have met a player I suspected of using a program. This was not due to his play style, but due to the fact that his typing speed was impossibly quick and his comments were repetitive. Furthermore, he wouldn't acknowledge a word I said. He would simply disregard me and state irrelevant comments. Perhaps he suffered from Hyperfingerretardation, but idk...

It's not a question of people using programs, but chess.com placing computers in place of human players so search times are not long.

This would make sense in a place that didn't have 10,000 players on at any one time, but not here where the social footprint and complete playing record leave a pretty easy trail to follow....

Yahoo! Chess (RIP), and funorb.com chess (RIP) would need such a system, and they obviously never did that. Chess.com wouldn't, and I wager it's pretty evident they wouldn't want to....

Oh I understand the question entirely. I do apologize for my unclear point. I was implying that perhaps this "person" I was playing was one of these chess.com bots we've been discussing. I figure that would explain, at least, the program-like behavior.

Point taken.

I think I'll lower my defenses a bit. I took your post as off-topic. Maybe it is, but there have been worse, and without the context of the OP's first reply in the thread, your post is on-topic....

I'll drink some water, resign my position, and return with a clean board....

sisu

Actually, I believe mebelalalana 's suspicions do have some serious weight to them, considering that they do this sort of thing at the sister site ChessKid.com so that people are not waiting for a game. Artificial but true.

I warned staff a while ago that this place (live chess) will turn into a ghost town if they don't fix the current issues.

Very simply, they could introduce a pools section so that would get people playing, like they have at ICC. They could offer prizes tournaments (of course, with policing at the same time). Introduce a champions league in live chess. Team events. They could delete the abort button. Or if you really want the abort button, make it so that BOTH players have to agree to abort.

These are just some examples, there are many other ways to get people playing chess and not sitting on their inflated ratings looking in the mirror.

Esquilax1
mebelalalana wrote:

i was not suggesting that there are no humans on chess.com. that would be ridiculous. i only suggested that it is possible that they sometimes use computer opponents to pose as human opponents.

There are computers on live chess, and they have names like Computer4 and Computer3.  But, does Chess.com have a stated position on whether they use computers with human names in live chess, to pose as real people, without telling the users?  And if they do, then, do we suspect that they are not telling us about it?

That would be some shady doings.  At least with "Vs. Computer" mode, undeniably sinful though it may be, they do not lie to the user about the identity of the opponent.  That particular form of wickedness is out in the open.

But you're on to something with the idea that there are actually no humans at all on chess.com.  I think that's generally understood to be true among any serious people.

RedTatsu256

Thanks, Esquilax1, for supporting my theory of computerized forum-trolls.

johnyoudell

I wonder if there is a computers' chess site where they ask themselves if disguised humans are playing amongst them?

anildash

calm down everybody

Sossitch
RedTatsu256 wrote:

Lmao this thread is both informative and entertaining! Good comeback, mebelalalana. I'm looking forward to seeing his reply. *Grabs popcorn*

VLaurenT
Trizack wrote:

Are there "people" playing Live Chess that are actually computers?

Many, but it's forbidden by the website rules and it's also forbidden to talk about it in the general forums...

dmxn2k

dmxn2k

dmxn2k
rdecredico wrote:

I think we have a winner....

Sossitch

Well played... 

RedTatsu256

Hahaha you guys are too funny. Although, I don't think "tan lines," a "dent resulting from lack of muscle," "improperly combed hair," "cloudy environment," or "lack of chess skills" have ever deterred me.