Here at chess.com we've learned to prioritize.
Curiosity Killed the Bat...
Sort:
I fear what's being planned for us next! 🐑
Will it be 🐏'd down our throats, or optional?
Feb 21, 2021
0
#27
batgirl wrote:
Except this is planned mediocrity (if it even rises to that level).
Businesses have a shelf life. Erik might be looking to ride the wave a bit, then cash out. Which is the cause and which is the effect is up for debate (at least I don't know.)
In any case quality doesn't have an immediate payout. It takes time, and people in today's world aren't interested in waiting around.
Feb 21, 2021
0
#28
llama47 wrote:
batgirl wrote:
Except this is planned mediocrity (if it even rises to that level).
Businesses have a shelf life. Erik might be looking to ride the wave a bit, then cash out. Which is the cause and which is the effect is up for debate (at least I don't know.)
In any case quality doesn't have an immediate payout. It takes time, and people in today's world aren't interested in waiting around.
Wut? No u. I have time. Let's race to 100. That'll show ya
Feb 21, 2021
0
#29
batgirl wrote:
Except this is planned mediocrity (if it even rises to that level).
Mediocrity in planning is planning for mediocrity. Or something like that...
Bunny is that really what you planned to say?
Feb 22, 2021
0
#31
The bunny never plans. He's all about action. Or words. Actually he has no idea.
Feb 22, 2021
0
#35
Looking at ' learn ' in the menu it appears something called 'Pogchamps' is somewhat the flavour of the moment.
I dont know what a Pogchamps ' is or what one is supposed to learn from it........unless its something to avoid.
As in all media the lack of quality in journalism continues to decline.
Batgirl and Simaginfan continue to produce articles of interest , and are well written too.
Feb 22, 2021
0
#36
Pog champs is the popular streamer vs popular streamer thing. They’re all bad at chess unfortunately
Feb 22, 2021
0
#37
B1ZMARK wrote:
Pog champs is the popular streamer vs popular streamer thing. They’re all bad at chess unfortunately
In other words, it's mindless and as anti-chess as something could possibly be.
So, since the last 10 articles are nothing but "Pog Champs," the logical place to put these pointless (relative to chess) things apparently is under "Learn," the logical progression is to remove all instructional articles because who would ever look for instructional material under "Learn?"
This place is reminding me of an actor who's become a parody of himself.
Feb 22, 2021
0
#38
They want to learn about the most recent developments of 800 rated players
Feb 22, 2021
0
#39
I don't care that they have this Poggie thing.
I'd just like to understand what it's got to do with "Learn" and why things that are actually about learning have been removed.
It also makes me wonder why the December 29, 2020 Peter Doggers article about “fashion” is considered learning material. It’s blatantly sexist. How does Capablanca’s wardrobe compare?
Apparently, that's the type of garbage they now prefer. *snip*
Fashion and flairs and medals, oh my.
Whatever could be more important? Oh yeah, points.