I love chess because the luck-factor is as slim as can be.
It's a war against your opponent and yourself in an ever lasting quest to improve.
It is some times Quote someone ''loosing with chess is like dying''
When i look at all sports it's the one with the last muscles and the most brains.
Some call it 'the game of the Kings''
Well,that's true in more than one way because i,m shore
the most of you remembered the story of that sword stuck in a stone and the one that could pull it out was king....
It wasn.t goliath who pulled the sword out but a kid with a
great heart and thats what chess is for some people (who are gifted)= A chance to prove themselfs.
I noticed on this forums that there's one ever returning qeustion :Who was the greatest ?
Capablanca=no one lost less than him.
Morphy = spectaculair
Fisher :Me against the world
Kasparov=russian science in chess : ''Think faster longer harder and work work work
Lasker,steinitz and even ''the only amteurwc ever Eeuwe
and loyd 'who was an inventor of crazy intelligent chessgames had all one thing in comon ::
Love for the game like Ronaldinho,pele ,M.jordan and'the albatross and the cannibal and polgard and lewis and the winner of the secondgrate spellingcontest : they just were
iT AINT FAIR TO COMPARE FISHER WITH KARPOV OR LASKER WITH CAPABLANCA BECAUSE IF THERE WAS SOMEONE BETTER THEY WOULD JUST STUDY HARDER
Just respect those players
They had the whole world as opponent and they invented
and lifted the chessgame to a higher level.
On the qeustion who's better you can't answer because
THEY ARE THE ONES THAT WENT WHERE NO ONE WHAS BEFORE or else they wouldn't have been part of history.
And who knows :maybe is the greatest chessplayer ever
some german farmer from the 14th century.
The best sprinter wont run harder Whitout competition
You need you chess-lovin-peers to climb the hill
The sicilian defense is older as fisher kasparov and karpov together and STILL it's played because our ancestors build a bridge and roads and now it's up to us to learn and respect.