Till you are the one breaking the rules now, remember the "no naming and shaming".
Help

Till if you look closely at his archives , he plays only high rated players , idk why , but he plays UNRATED ,
some players only play unrated keep their rating low and Suprise the opponent , could be....

I have no idea how he plays higher rated opponents, no high rated opponent accepts challenges from 900 players, seems odd

It is unusual for a 900 player to play so well in the opening; Till is right he is a cheater. Most player below 1500 don't play the opening so well like Ravim, even in his loses he is not lost. I don't understand how he is able to play against strong player with his very low rating. Till, how did he chalenge you to a game?

Til i've played you and see you as n honourable chess player it may be that you was sandbagged by the player rest assured to many you have a good name dont let this individual ruin for you the game yo play well in

Till you are the one breaking the rules now, remember the "no naming and shaming".
Please, he is does that all the time
In fact, we all do! So unlesss you are saying something really vulgar or inappropriate, you will be fine.

I often accept challenges from low rated players as a sign of respect and to show that I am still down to earth. I enjoy playing with everyone who likes, but of course I didnt expect to get a cheater. Cheers

Till you are the one breaking the rules now, remember the "no naming and shaming".
Please, he is does that all the time
In fact, we all do! So unlesss you are saying something really vulgar or inappropriate, you will be fine.
Yes, but they are more sensitive with cheating accusations.
What should I do to this guy? He is rated 900 here on chess.com and was playing like at least 2000 or like an engine. Here the game we played in which he was probably slightly better: http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=921402731
At one point I stopped moving to talk with him about his sandbagging/cheating and a not so nice conversation started:
OBSERVING GAME (921400493) - bombermanul vs. NM ortznoi57 (3 0 rated) -
NEW GAME (921402342) - ravim20 vs. Till_98 (3 0 unrated)
Till_98: hi
ravim20: hola
GAME ABORTED - ravim20 vs. Till_98 - Game has been aborted by the server
NEW GAME (921402731) - ravim20 vs. Till_98 (3 0 unrated)
Till_98: my friend why are you sand bagging?
ravim20: babish
Till_98: babish?
ravim20: play babuy
Till_98: babuy?
Till_98: what means that?
ravim20: ur time
Till_98: what means babuy?
Till_98: i wont play you
ravim20: lol
ravim20: ur A ss losing
GAME OVER - ravim20 vs. Till_98 - ravim20 won on time.
Share on Facebook | Share on Twitter
Review with opponent | Review alone
Till_98: jerk
Till_98: stop sandbagging or cheating, otherwise I support you
ravim20: may have violated our Fair Play policy - it has been noted and they may have their account restricted.
Till_98: and you will get banned
ravim20: Till_98 may have violated our Fair Play policy - it has been noted and they may have their account restricted.
ravim20: u a cheat man
Till_98: you will get banned
Till_98: 900 player?
Till_98: hahahha
Till_98: no way
Till_98: cheater
ravim20: my name is vladimir Kramnik
Till_98: shut up
ravim20: u idio T
Till_98: shut up
ravim20: ur A ss stupid
Till_98: I will support you
Till_98: why are you doing this?
ravim20 has left the chat.
What should I do with this guy? I dont like supporting someone but its obvious that he was either sandbagging or cheating. Cheers, Till