How many people have left the site since the change in format?

Sort:
ilikeflags
ClavierCavalier wrote:

We should do a poll!

Did you leave the site after the format change?

A.  Yes.

B.  No.

It'd be interesting to see if someone says yes.  I mean, they shouldn't be on the site anymore to see the poll, right?

you've been here for 2 months.  when did you become part of "we"? 

waffllemaster
ilikeflags wrote:
ClavierCavalier wrote:

We should do a poll!

Did you leave the site after the format change?

A.  Yes.

B.  No.

It'd be interesting to see if someone says yes.  I mean, they shouldn't be on the site anymore to see the poll, right?

you've been here for 2 months.  when did you become part of "we"? 

Approximately 2 months ago...      Laughing

ilikeflags

ain't that the truth

checkersgosu

What has changed?

Everything looks the same to me. 

upsign

ewww...new graphics for chess pieces are not appealing and confusing...looking elsewhere due new pieces and also because the game freezes more often than before

kco
upsign wrote:

ewww...new graphics for chess pieces are not appealing and confusing...looking elsewhere due new pieces and also because the game freezes more often than before

games freezes-sound like you got poor internet connection or got poor computer.

ivandh
upsign wrote:

ewww...new graphics for chess pieces are not appealing and confusing...looking elsewhere due new pieces and also because the game freezes more often than before

Now people are joining so that they can complain about the new format.

kco

and he just made a thread about it.

winerkleiner

Long term it will pay off and Erik knows it.  Is there stock available?

gambit-man
winerkleiner wrote:

Long term it will pay off and Erik knows it.  Is there stock available?

yeah, you can buy in here if you like it http://www.chess.com/membership.html?c=navbar

gambit-man

BTW, is your name really winer? isn't that an americanism for, like, male genitalia?

gambit-man
kco wrote:

I see, gambit man and DrPhill still beating about in the bush huh. 

Does it bother you that other people may have problems with the site?

gambit-man

Just above the text of the post, at the right-hand-side, next to the post number. are you really not seeing it?

kco
gambit-man wrote:
kco wrote:

I see, gambit man and DrPhill still beating about in the bush huh. 

Does it bother you that other people may have problems with the site?

it seem to be only affecting a very small number of members here.

gambit-man

you think?

kco

no, he was talking to me but please snakesbelly do carry on.....

DrPhil
kco wrote:
gambit-man wrote:
kco wrote:

I see, gambit man and DrPhill still beating about in the bush huh. 

Does it bother you that other people may have problems with the site?

it seem to be only affecting a very small number of members here.

So rather than having our problems fixed, you'd see us shut up?

I pay for this site. Therefore I expect a certain level of service, and that this level should not decrease during the time my subscription runs. And it has.

So I'll be beating around the bush till it's solved or my subscription runs out. I'd rather not go through the trouble of setting up shop elsewhere - there are some things to like here on chess.com - but right now, I don't get what i paid for.

 

That more than entitles me to complain. You're free not to read it if it bothers you.

kco

with that tone of yours no wonder anybody gonna listen to you.

rounakshinha

Englund Gambit Complex (Englund Gambit) chess trap http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mN9chuyvuI

gambit-man
kco wrote:

no, he was talking to me but please snakesbelly do carry on.....

so that you don't have to answer?

The next time you buy an iphone that doesn't work properly because you are holding it in the wrong way, the next time your car gives you trouble and your mechanic tells you he can't fix it, the next time you walk down the the street and slip on ice because the local authority hasn't treated the pavement, just remember that millions more have no problems with theirs. It must be your fault