how the forums don't reflect chess
Sort:
Hi
BISHOP_e3 wrote:
Does "low" effort spam have less salt?
Definitely less salt of the earth
Feb 16, 2024
0
#23
B1ZMARK wrote:
plus moderators aren't paid
what? are you saying the world's #1 chess site printing money but relying on free services for their website moderation?
Feb 16, 2024
0
#24
robzmbi wrote:
B1ZMARK wrote:
plus moderators aren't paid
what? are you saying the world's #1 chess site printing money but relying on free services for their website moderation?
this isn't exactly groundbreaking news
B1ZMARK wrote:
robzmbi wrote:
what? are you saying the world's #1 chess site printing money but relying on free services for their website moderation?
this isn't exactly groundbreaking news
Everything's ground shaking and projectile vomiting for Rob zombie
Feb 16, 2024
0
#26
sawdof wrote:
B1ZMARK wrote:
robzmbi wrote:
what? are you saying the world's #1 chess site printing money but relying on free services for their website moderation?
this isn't exactly groundbreaking news
Everything's ground shaking and projectile vomiting for Rob zombie
jokes on me 
Feb 16, 2024
0
#27
but seriously, i was surprised.. chess.com makes good money and why they don't just use professionals i wondered, seems like they need it
robzmbi wrote:
but seriously, i was surprised.. chess.com makes good money and why they don't just use professionals i wondered, seems like they need it
The mods are "managed" by paid staff I believe. Unsure of the actual dynamics. The problem I believe isn't just the lack of mods but the unclear policy and conflicting goals of pleasing the perceived majority. Right now it seems to be religious homeschooled kids and good "clean" spam may be preferred to the more adult bar style controversial conversations (which seemed to be more of the norm a decade ago). A lot of the site posturing has been left leaning previously and given the shift in demographics that may change
But what does a bunny know?
Whenever I'm forced to "take it" I find something to take. It's very cathartic.
Why are spam topics like these pinned??
Fwiw, any topic with titles containing "people above/below" with posts of just yes/no or numbers is just spam.
This reminds me of what this is lol 
It isn't just kids there's plenty of adults to doing it
No ik a 22 year old that tries to bully people on chess.com full grown adult just trolling
And all the 60+ year olds like arguing or attacking people to much (only a few )
The kids are the ones saying copium or skill issue
There's plenty of decent 12 year olds but some of them can get annoying
And the ones complaining about cheating are at any age paranoia can effect anyone
May 19, 2024
0
#35
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
It isn't just kids there's plenty of adults to doing it
like ME!
B1ZMARK wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
It isn't just kids there's plenty of adults to doing it
like ME!
well u literally grew up here
I thought you said you had a job 💀
Z
Z
Z
TheKrugingDunnerEffect wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
No ik a 22 year old that tries to bully people on chess.com full grown adult just trolling
And all the 60+ year olds like arguing or attacking people to much (only a few )
The kids are the ones saying copium or skill issue
There's plenty of decent 12 year olds but some of them can get annoying
And the ones complaining about cheating are at any age paranoia can effect anyone
Yeah, I'm 13 and very disappointed in how others my age or a bit older act...
A majority of the kids on here don't even play chess lol, they just go to off-topic forums.
Never mind I might be thinking about @taken
May 19, 2024
0
#39
sawdof wrote:
if someone came to check out chess.com to see what discussions were on the forum, this is what they would see right now.
well atleast 1 forum asking how to play against the fried liver lol we might have some hope
