Live Chess Stats: A Painful Dilemna...

Sort:
bigpoison

TheGrobe wrote:  "I'd imagine every paying member spent at least a little bit of time perusing the site as a free user."

Exactly what I was thinking.

SukerPuncher333
Devout_Monk wrote:

As this is JUST a set of friendly online stats, I don't see any reason why it should even be an issue.


I read this and thought: "Exactly!" But then I read this...

Devout_Monk wrote:

And even if I have paid to have all of my games on here saved for eternity, I, for one, am actually happy with the fact that I'll just have to go back and play more and more to replace such a rating. In fact, with the experience I've gained at chess.com over the last 6 months, a "reboot" should make me able to get a higher rating than before!

Not judging anyone here, but for some reason many people share this view: "I don't care about ratings/stats. They are meaningless numbers. But hey, I want to have them reset, even if means deleting the games."

That just doesn't make sense logically. You don't care about the stats, yet you still want to have them reset? Why would you want to change something that you didn't care about in the first place? Below is another example:

DanielleSurferGirl wrote:

Ratings are just numbers, I think we should start everyone with a clean slate. After playing for more than 4 months now, i am ready for my numbers to erase


(I'm assuming "Ratings are just numbers" means that she doesn't care about the ratings, but apologies in advance if my interpretation is wrong). And yet another example below:

CPawn wrote:

Reset everything Erik...there is way to much emphasis on rating/wins/losses/etc


You guys feel that ratings/stats are superficial numbers that shouldn't deserve so much attention, yet...you are also willing to erase all the games just to get fresh new rating/stats. Makes no sense at all...

TheGrobe

I have to confess that the reasons for my wanting to see them reset are largely symbolic.  I agree that it really doesn't make much of a difference from a practical standpoint, however Live Chess 2.0 represents a new beginning after an unfortunate shaky start with the first incarnation and I feel that wiping the slate clean will have the effect of re-enforicing the separation from the previous flawed version in the minds of the users and hopefully make for a smoother transition -- even if only psychologically.

Alpha0

Wipe it all away.. Despite the fact that I like to look at some of my glory games occasionslly. I can always download those pgns if i want.

Ultimately I will have about the same rating as I do now if i play the same amount of games 3,000+ so its fine with me. Anyone who has a problem about having a low rating will simply have to win a few matches to prove once agian what they are worth. The beginners will be beginners, the advanced will be advanced.

SukerPuncher333
TheGrobe wrote:

I have to confess that the reasons for my wanting to see them reset are largely symbolic. I agree that it really doesn't make much of a difference from a practical standpoint, however Live Chess 2.0 represents a new beginning after an unfortunate shaky start with the first incarnation and I feel that wiping the slate clean will have the effect of re-enforicing the separation from the previous flawed version in the minds of the users and hopefully make for a smoother transition -- even if only psychologically.


That was my suspicion all along, and I've actually suggested that reason in this very thread, several times. But nobody would confirm my suspicion except you. People kept referring to strange reasons that I still can't comprehend. Thank you for being straightforward though.

SukerPuncher333
Catalyst_Kh wrote:

People, you want to wipe all rating and stats, that is understandable, i agreed with that too. But why do you want to erase games from databases at all - that i cant understand. Do you ashamed of your games or what?


That's probably a major reason. But Erik has a technical reason: it's difficult to reset the stats without also deleting the games. I'm not sure why, but according to Erik, that's how the system works.

Basically it boils down to two factors: keeping the games versus deleting the stats. Unless they find a way to do both, of course.

Dakota_Clark
Schachgeek wrote:
Devout_Monk wrote:

 And the free-users really shouldn't have any say in it, either. I only purchased my Premium 1-year less than a month ago, but it bodes well with me that I have PAID to have a heard opinion in site development. In the end, the decision comes to the staff (like the electoral college), but should be influenced by giving what the [paying!] people want.

 

~Devout_Monk, Dakota Clark


In the USA, if you want to win an election and have lots of money, you can buy one.

If you are accused of a crime and have lots of money, you can afford the best attorney on the continent and often buy a verdict.

If you are sued civilly and have lots of money, that cash will allow you to buy the best attorney on the continent who will frequently prevail or at least limit your losses.

Should money make a difference in the wipe/don't wipe old live chess ratings and results discussion?

NO!

Not if you're going to be fair about it. Why shouldn't free members be able to express their desires in this matter? Are free members sub-human? Genetically inferior? What?

No matter how it turns out (I'm sure Erik has already decided) there will be people alienated by the result. Paid members might cancel. Free members who might have become paid members could instead flee for other sites.

A tough call for Erik and staff.


 I didn't bother reading your whiny post because you're a free player...   Laughing

 

Anyway, I think that if you say it's "not fair!" for a paying member to voice opinion and have it be heard louder than a free-players, you simply have more issues than I even imagined. That's how the world works, as you so clearly expressed (though in MUCH more dramatic and ridiculous terms).

Battlemage

I loose many games on disconnect but why be upsett by it? I know how good/bad I play so it does not matter if my rating is 1500 or 2000 at this point... If I am a 2000 player it will not take for ever to prove that when the net is up and running..... If I loose 50 games on disconnect and win only 10 games does not matter to me.. why should it?? I think people who making this to be a problem need to look inside there head... Thats where the real problem is then

EternalChess

i really dont care what you do, im more on the deleting everything side, becuase those people who disconnected alot wanted Live Chess 2, not the people that never disconnected, so if those people that disconnected before cant even play Live Chess 2, what was the point.

Im sure everyone can live with it.. it is honestly no big deal.

RealSelf

What about having a vote? If there is an overwhelming majority for one side or the other then you will be able to make a better decision.

PeterArt

hmm i like to keep my stats, erasing the games isnt a problem, but i'follow my stats progress, one of the reasons that i became a member to collect my progress data.

i imagine the chess application we see is like a front-end application to a database. if the frontend changes, with new code to limit disconnects, then why should the backend (the database) also be erased, as within a few weeks it should balance i think.

BTW it would be great if life chess 2 had some kind of low bandwidth connection so it could better deal with that, maybe create a SSL secured client, and use some kind of telnet movement protocol (like other chess sites), it could work together with the web site, just add another lowbandwidth protocol interface please..

Nytik

Yes, schachgeek, Devout_Monk does seem to be suffering from the delusion that he is a better person because he pays for the site.

Luckily, we don't all share this view. Cool

Archaic71

How about you just move all of the old games to their slow play database, leave the ratings, and let them prove they are worthy.  I got DC on my first three attempts at live chess, I have played nothing but slow chess ever since.  I would love to be able to play live on chess.com, if anything - it would have me here more - not less.

SukerPuncher333
Devout_Monk wrote:

Anyway, I think that if you say it's "not fair!" for a paying member to voice opinion and have it be heard louder than a free-players, you simply have more issues than I even imagined. That's how the world works, as you so clearly expressed (though in MUCH more dramatic and ridiculous terms).


So I'm looking at the webpage with the list of premium features, but wait a minute, I don't see "more important opinions" as a feature for premium members.

When you became premium, chess.com gave you a clear list of the features you'll be getting. I think you are the one who has issues if you are conjuring up imaginary privileges that you think you deserve, privileges that chess.com never even mentioned. Why don't we all just become premium members and each make up our own imaginary features?

pimpskillz
DanielleSurferGirl wrote:

Ratings are just numbers, I think we should start everyone with a clean slate. After playing for more than 4 months now, i am ready for my numbers to erase, if it does I will not play any rated games anymore, this way my rating will remain at 1200, no one will no how good ot bad I am, & if they play me they know it will be just for the fun of playing chess. 


 I like your view. Hmmm makes for an interesting deception. care to play? for fun of course.

pimpskillz
Novice1100 wrote:

In the new one if the time runs out you could still play it to the end even if you lost on time it should be like that just to keep some interesting for instas!!


 I agree 100%

pimpskillz
batgirl wrote:

The ratings and records should be erased. Give everyone ample time to save games if they want.  But it should be obvious that, if some people have low ratings and lost games due to inherent problems with Live Chess, the people with good ratings and won games, have those advantages partly due to the former group's misfortunes.  I don't see any dilemma. Ratings, etc., will eventually gravitate toward their proper levels.


 Like this one too

bobb3

A friend of mine just joined chess.com a few days ago. Somehow he has a rating of 1200.

Which is really ridiculous, He is just a beginner. I am trying to set him up to play live chess. Is there any way to reset this and let him earn his ratings ... ?

I am trying to set him up with players in the 400-600 range. 30 min. games I have changed the settings to reflect this, but I can't find anyplace to reset his rating.

Is there an easy way to do this ? So far I can find nothing.

Ezrekiel

Last post before yours in this thread was 4 years old...

 

You sure take thread necromancy to a new level.

kohai

You can't reset his ratings. When people join the site they are all given a start rating of 1200