Sandbagging is a real problem at 1500

Sort:
BigChessplayer665
SliceofLife wrote:
egniib wrote:

Its very possible they are tilted. A while ago I had 2 very good chess weeks and gained much rating and came to a 1740 rating. Then I kept losing and losing and a week or 2 ago I was back ar 1580 or so. Sometimes you just have very good or very bad weeks. It's not sandbagging at all. Also, who would want to lose hundreds of points on purpose?

It doesn't need to be 'on purpose'. If a person plays half-heartedly and loses 200 points through early resignations, sloppy play and playing while drunk etc, this is still rating manipulation. It means that the players they come up against at the lowest point of their tilt are being unfairly disadvantaged.

No it isn't lmao it's not if it's by accident unless your seign every game by move 4 losing doesn't mean anything if youa actually try to win

BigChessplayer665
HalsteadH wrote:

I am playing at a much lower level, but I have dropped, and I sure am not sandbagging. I have wondered what has happened, several thoughts occur to me:

1. I get into phases where I am trying out some new opening or defense; get clobbered for awhile as a result.

2. Like a lot of low-level players I have the rating I have because I blunder a lot. I'm a "well over 1300 player when I don't blunder." The same is true to a lesser degree of players at 1500 ... you need to get up over 2000 to be in the league where players blunder little. I get into runs where I blunder, and drop. Conversely when I don't blunder I probably look like a "sandbagger" to you.

3. At the lower levels there are players moving up rapidly, because they joined chess.com and are working up to their natural level. I have gotten plastered by players who quickly moved up hundreds of points above me afterwards. For whatever reason, I ran into a short string of these.

3. Cheating? Several times I have been just pasted by low-level players making really great moves, but on analysis they aren't making the best moves (they don't need to, because I am pretty crummy), so who knows?

Whatever, even the cheaters if that's what they are, playing chess here is a gift, and worrying about your online rating is immature. If you want to obsess about ratings, go play real tournaments. Otherwise, when you get beaten do the analysis and try to improve your game.

If you want to worry about your rating otb is actually better because at least you earn something (ex a title ) making excuses for why your 1500 and not 1600 is disappointing and saying "they sucked and lost a bunch accidental rating manipulation !"

Sorry but eating manipulation is usually either 1.resigning every game too quickly (multiple by move four )

Or to 2.inflating your elo

Losing a bunch of games because you sucked inst rating manipulation

trw0311

People might calibrate way higher than their real rating if they get lucky. Not proof of a Sandbagger. Want to see rampant sandbagging? Play on LC. Ugh it’s so annoying. I’m trying to get to 2000, beat 2 1950s, go up 10 points. Then get matched with like a 1770, they play like a GM, and I lose 7. I just abort those games now because there is no point in risking it to get +4. Their matchmaking system is so whack and there are so many cheaters!

BigChessplayer665
trw0311 wrote:

People might calibrate way higher than their real rating if they get lucky. Not proof of a Sandbagger. Want to see rampant sandbagging? Play on LC. Ugh it’s so annoying. I’m trying to get to 2000, beat 2 1950s, go up 10 points. Then get matched with like a 1770, they play like a GM, and I lose 7. I just abort those games now because there is no point in risking it to get +4. Their matchmaking system is so whack and there are so many cheaters!

Lichess ? In the random pool I haven't had much of a problem maybe each big tournament there's usually 1-2 cheaters but usually you can outfarm them in games I dunno maybe it's just me but I haven't really had much of a problem

trw0311
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
trw0311 wrote:

People might calibrate way higher than their real rating if they get lucky. Not proof of a Sandbagger. Want to see rampant sandbagging? Play on LC. Ugh it’s so annoying. I’m trying to get to 2000, beat 2 1950s, go up 10 points. Then get matched with like a 1770, they play like a GM, and I lose 7. I just abort those games now because there is no point in risking it to get +4. Their matchmaking system is so whack and there are so many cheaters!

Lichess ? In the random pool I haven't had much of a problem maybe each big tournament there's usually 1-2 cheaters but usually you can outfarm them in games I dunno maybe it's just me but I haven't really had much of a problem

I once was refunded rating for 5 rapid games all in the same day on there lol. At least they catch some of them and refund you. I think it’s pretty easy to make multiple accounts on there and the cheating is definitely worse than on chess.com. I shouldn’t be getting matched with players -150 rating than me anyway , and they typically will blow you off the board. 

that and the disproportionate amount of games with the black pieces. It’s easy to abort games and people definitely abuse it. I shouldn’t be getting black 5 games in a row while trying to increase my rating.

i just train on there and use chess.com rating as my metric.

BigChessplayer665
trw0311 wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
trw0311 wrote:

People might calibrate way higher than their real rating if they get lucky. Not proof of a Sandbagger. Want to see rampant sandbagging? Play on LC. Ugh it’s so annoying. I’m trying to get to 2000, beat 2 1950s, go up 10 points. Then get matched with like a 1770, they play like a GM, and I lose 7. I just abort those games now because there is no point in risking it to get +4. Their matchmaking system is so whack and there are so many cheaters!

Lichess ? In the random pool I haven't had much of a problem maybe each big tournament there's usually 1-2 cheaters but usually you can outfarm them in games I dunno maybe it's just me but I haven't really had much of a problem

I once was refunded rating for 5 rapid games all in the same day on there lol. At least they catch some of them and refund you. I think it’s pretty easy to make multiple accounts on there and the cheating is definitely worse than on chess.com. I shouldn’t be getting matched with players -150 rating than me anyway , and they typically will blow you off the board.

that and the disproportionate amount of games with the black pieces. It’s easy to abort games and people definitely abuse it. I shouldn’t be getting black 5 games in a row while trying to increase my rating.

i just train on there and use chess.com rating as my metric.

I get beaten by 2100s sometimes it happens even when they aren't cheating I have had 50/50 win rates against 2500s before

if you get black five times in a row ? I got white multiple times in a row before if it's randomly generated it should do that I don't see how it being the black pieces makes it any worse

trw0311
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
trw0311 wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
trw0311 wrote:

People might calibrate way higher than their real rating if they get lucky. Not proof of a Sandbagger. Want to see rampant sandbagging? Play on LC. Ugh it’s so annoying. I’m trying to get to 2000, beat 2 1950s, go up 10 points. Then get matched with like a 1770, they play like a GM, and I lose 7. I just abort those games now because there is no point in risking it to get +4. Their matchmaking system is so whack and there are so many cheaters!

Lichess ? In the random pool I haven't had much of a problem maybe each big tournament there's usually 1-2 cheaters but usually you can outfarm them in games I dunno maybe it's just me but I haven't really had much of a problem

I once was refunded rating for 5 rapid games all in the same day on there lol. At least they catch some of them and refund you. I think it’s pretty easy to make multiple accounts on there and the cheating is definitely worse than on chess.com. I shouldn’t be getting matched with players -150 rating than me anyway , and they typically will blow you off the board.

that and the disproportionate amount of games with the black pieces. It’s easy to abort games and people definitely abuse it. I shouldn’t be getting black 5 games in a row while trying to increase my rating.

i just train on there and use chess.com rating as my metric.

I get beaten by 2100s sometimes it happens even when they aren't cheating I have had 50/50 win rates against 2500s before

if you get black five times in a row ? I got white multiple times in a row before if it's randomly generated it should do that I don't see how it being the black pieces makes it any worse

It is random but players will abort games till they get white pieces, it’s pretty easy to do apparently because it happens often to me often. I get white and the player aborts and then I’ll get rematched with them by chance and they have white and play! Imagine playing in an OTB tourney and you only get black 6/7 games… probably won’t be a good day for your rating!

KhaoticKnight
SliceofLife wrote:
GabeMiami10 wrote:

They're probably tilted. 🙄. They've gone through ups and downs. Please stop accusing someone based on that

You can't tilt 300 points of elo that's ridiculous. The only way to do that is to not try for ages, which is basically sandbagging.

Actually you can tilt 300 points. I've tilted over 100 points in one night

BigChessplayer665
trw0311 wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
trw0311 wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
trw0311 wrote:

People might calibrate way higher than their real rating if they get lucky. Not proof of a Sandbagger. Want to see rampant sandbagging? Play on LC. Ugh it’s so annoying. I’m trying to get to 2000, beat 2 1950s, go up 10 points. Then get matched with like a 1770, they play like a GM, and I lose 7. I just abort those games now because there is no point in risking it to get +4. Their matchmaking system is so whack and there are so many cheaters!

Lichess ? In the random pool I haven't had much of a problem maybe each big tournament there's usually 1-2 cheaters but usually you can outfarm them in games I dunno maybe it's just me but I haven't really had much of a problem

I once was refunded rating for 5 rapid games all in the same day on there lol. At least they catch some of them and refund you. I think it’s pretty easy to make multiple accounts on there and the cheating is definitely worse than on chess.com. I shouldn’t be getting matched with players -150 rating than me anyway , and they typically will blow you off the board.

that and the disproportionate amount of games with the black pieces. It’s easy to abort games and people definitely abuse it. I shouldn’t be getting black 5 games in a row while trying to increase my rating.

i just train on there and use chess.com rating as my metric.

I get beaten by 2100s sometimes it happens even when they aren't cheating I have had 50/50 win rates against 2500s before

if you get black five times in a row ? I got white multiple times in a row before if it's randomly generated it should do that I don't see how it being the black pieces makes it any worse

It is random but players will abort games till they get white pieces, it’s pretty easy to do apparently because it happens often to me often. I get white and the player aborts and then I’ll get rematched with them by chance and they have white and play! Imagine playing in an OTB tourney and you only get black 6/7 games… probably won’t be a good day for your rating!

I don't get that at my level probably because my level actually knows how to play with the black pieces, salty gamers

BigChessplayer665
trw0311 wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
trw0311 wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
trw0311 wrote:

People might calibrate way higher than their real rating if they get lucky. Not proof of a Sandbagger. Want to see rampant sandbagging? Play on LC. Ugh it’s so annoying. I’m trying to get to 2000, beat 2 1950s, go up 10 points. Then get matched with like a 1770, they play like a GM, and I lose 7. I just abort those games now because there is no point in risking it to get +4. Their matchmaking system is so whack and there are so many cheaters!

Lichess ? In the random pool I haven't had much of a problem maybe each big tournament there's usually 1-2 cheaters but usually you can outfarm them in games I dunno maybe it's just me but I haven't really had much of a problem

I once was refunded rating for 5 rapid games all in the same day on there lol. At least they catch some of them and refund you. I think it’s pretty easy to make multiple accounts on there and the cheating is definitely worse than on chess.com. I shouldn’t be getting matched with players -150 rating than me anyway , and they typically will blow you off the board.

that and the disproportionate amount of games with the black pieces. It’s easy to abort games and people definitely abuse it. I shouldn’t be getting black 5 games in a row while trying to increase my rating.

i just train on there and use chess.com rating as my metric.

I get beaten by 2100s sometimes it happens even when they aren't cheating I have had 50/50 win rates against 2500s before

if you get black five times in a row ? I got white multiple times in a row before if it's randomly generated it should do that I don't see how it being the black pieces makes it any worse

It is random but players will abort games till they get white pieces, it’s pretty easy to do apparently because it happens often to me often. I get white and the player aborts and then I’ll get rematched with them by chance and they have white and play! Imagine playing in an OTB tourney and you only get black 6/7 games… probably won’t be a good day for your rating!

I guess tho playing with black is easier than you think unless it's long games

In blitz chess literally just spam the scandi it's genuinely op in blitz (don't forget the staford for under 2000) it's still playable even at my level tho

The carokann is actually painfull for white unless they play something similar to the twoknights (iv been getting great positions with it )